رابطه علّی تعاملات آموزشی با رضایت تحصیلی از طریق میانجی‌گری خودتنظیمی ‌تحصیلی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار و عضو هیات علمی گروه روان شناسی تربیتی دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

در تحقیق حاضر،رابطه علّی تعاملات آموزشی با رضایت تحصیلی از طریق میانجیگری خودتنظیمی‌تحصیلی مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور اهواز (1392) جامعه آماری تحقیق حاضر را تشکیل دادهاند که از بین آنها 500 نفر به صورت تصادفی چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها از پرسشنامه‌های تعاملات آموزشی، رضایت تحصیلی و خودتنظیمی ‌تحصیلی استفاده
گردید. نتیجه نشان داد که تعاملات آموزشی (تعامل دانشجو- دانشجو، تعامل دانشجو- استاد و تعامل دانشجو- محتوا) با رضایت تحصیلی
رابطه علّی مثبت و رابطه تعامل دانشجو- دانشجو و دانشجو- محتوا با رضایت تحصیلی از طریق خودتنظیمی ‌تحصیلی معنی‌دار اما مسیر تعامل دانشجو- استاد به رضایت تحصیلی از طریق یادگیری خودتنظیمی‌معنی‌دار نشد. بر مبنای تحقیق حاضر پیشنهاد می‌شود
برای ‌ایجاد رضایت تحصیلی، تقویت تعامل دانشجو- دانشجو و دانشجو- محتوا در دانشجویان بسیار ضروری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


فارسی

خراسانی، اباصلت و دوستی، هومن (1390). ارزیابی میزان رضایت و اهمیت عوامل مؤثر بر اثر بخشی آموزش‌های الکترونیکی از دیدگاه کارکنان. فصلنامه فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات در علوم تربیتی، سال اول، شماره چهارم. ص 37-58.

سواری، کریم و عرب‌زاده، شیما (1392). ساخت و تعیین ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی پرسشنامه خودتنظیمی‌ تحصیلی. مجله روانشناسی مدرسه، دوره 2، شماره 2، ص 75 – 92 .

سواری، کریم (1391). ساخت و اعتباریابی تعاملات آموزشی در دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور اهواز. گزارش تحقیقاتی چاپ نشده.

سواری، کریم (1391). رضایت تحصیلی در دانشجویان دانشگاه پیام نور اهواز. گزارش تحقیقاتی چاپ نشده.

سیف، علی‌اکبر (1387). روان‌شناسی پرورشی (روان‌شناسی یادگیری و آموزش). چاپ شانزدهم، تهران: انتشارات آگاه.

 

لاتین

Afzaal, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of allamaIqbal open university. Contemporary Educational Technology, 2 (2), 118-134.

Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (2), 83-97.

Anderson, T., & Garrison, D. (1995). Transactional issues in distance education: The impact of design in audioteleconferencing. The American Journal of Distance Education, 9 (2), 27-45.

Artino, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8 (3), 191-202.

Aviv, R. (2001). Educational performance of ALN via content analysis. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4 (2). Retrieved June 16, 2007, from http://www.aln.org/ alnweb,journal, l14_issue2.

Bray, E., Aoki, K., & Dlugosh, L. (2008). Predictors of learning satisfaction in Japanese online distance learners. International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 9 (3), 1-24.

Bolliger, D., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal on E-Learning, 3 (1), 61-67.

Byers, A. (2000). Interaction: The key to successful distance learning. Paper presented at EdMedia 2000: World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Montreal, Canada.

Chang, S. H., & Smith, R. A. (2008). Effectiveness of personal interaction in a learner-centered paradigm distance education class based on student satisfaction. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40 (4), 407–426.

Chejlyk, S. (2006). The effects of online course format and three components of student perceived interactions on overall course satisfaction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (04).

Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94 (1), 57-72.

Flammer, F. (1984). The Achievement of Learning and Learning Efficiency as the Basis for Recognizing and Rewarding Teaching, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.

Fresen, J. (2007). A taxonomy of factors to promote quality web-supported learning. International Journal on E-Learning, 6 (3), 351-362.

Fulford, C., & Zhan, S. (1993). Predicting student satisfaction from perceptions of interaction in distance. learning, IFIP Transactions A: Computer Science and Technology No. A-29: 259-268.

Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11, 3, 8–26.

Hirji, N. (2006). It's self-regulation, but not as we knew it. Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, 29, 57-58.

Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1998). Online social interchange, discord, and knowledge construction. Journal of Distance Education, 13, 1, 57–74.

Kershaw, A. (1996). People, planning, and process: The acceptance of technological innovation in post- secondary organizations. Educational Technology, 36, 44-48.

Keeler, L. (2006). Student satisfaction and types of interaction in distance education courses. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (09).

Kuo, Y., Walker, A. E. Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2008). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open & Distance Learning, 14, 1, 16-39.

La Pointe, K., & Gunawarndena, C. (2004). Developing, testing and refining of a model to understand the relationship between peer interaction and learning outcomes in computer-mediated conferencing. Distance Education, 25 (1), 83–106.

Mardali, L., & Koushki., SH. (2008). The relationship between academic achievement and self- regulation. Andishe va Raftar, 2 (7), 69-78.

Marks, R., Sibley, S., & Arbaugh, J. (2005).A structural equation model of predictors for effective online learning. Journal of Management Education, 29 (4), 531–563.

Moore, G. (2002). What does research say about the learners using computer- mediated communication in distance learning. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16 (2), 61–64.

Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, CA.

Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity into Web-based Instruction. Educational Technology, 41 (2), 31-39.

Perez, C. (2001). Factors influencing how students value asynchronous Web- based courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas. Dissertation Abstract International, AAT 9989796.

Picciano, A. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6 (1), 21-40.

Pintrich, P. & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learningcomponents of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.

Reinhart, J., & Schneider, P. (2001). Student satisfaction, self-efficacy, and the perception of the two-way audio/video distance learning environment: A preliminary examination. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2 (4), 357- 365.

Roblyer, M., & Wiencke, W. (2003). Design and use of a rubric to assess and encourage interactive qualities in distance courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17 (2), 77-98.

Rodriguez, Robles, F. (2006). Learner characteristic, interaction and support service variables as predictors of satisfaction in Web-based distance education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 67 (07).

Rost, B. (2000). Interaction analyzed in traditional and satellite-delivered extension education presentations. Journal of Extension, 38 (1).

Sabry, K., & Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 443-454.

Sahin, I. (2007). Predicting student satisfaction in distance education and learning environments. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED496541).

Salehi, M., & Enayati, T. (2009). The relationship between the main components of studying/learning strategies and academic achievement of Islamic Azad university students. Journal of New Achievement in Educational Management, 2 (3), 135-45.

Stavredes, M. (2002). A case study of student experiences using alternative systems of delivery: Face-to-face versus interactive television video and computer mediated communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. Dissertation Abstract International, AAT 3037491.

Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22 (2), 306-316.

Thurmond, V., & Wambach, K. (2004). Understanding interactions in distance education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1 (1), 9-26.

Young, A., & Norgard, C. (2006). Assessing the quality of online courses from the students' perspective. Internet and Higher Education, 9, 107–115.

Yukselturk, E., & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Investigation of interaction, online support, course structure and flexibility as the contributing factors to students’ satisfaction in an online certificate program. Educational Technology & Society, 11 (4), 51-65.

Wang, Y. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41 (1), 75-86.

Weinstein, C., & Hume, L. (1998). Study strategies for life long learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Winters, F., Azevedo, R., & Levin, D. (2004). How do high school students regulate their learning when using a computer-based environment to collaboratively engage in inquiry? Presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Wilson, J. (2008). An examination of the relationships of interaction, learner styles, and course content on student satisfaction and outcomes in online learning. Unpublished EdD, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba.

Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai, C., & Tan, H. (2005). What makes a difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107 (8), 1836–1884.