نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه اصفهان

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی رابطه مؤلفه‌­های عملکرد خانواده (مؤلفه‌­های همبستگی، بیانگری، تفاهم، گرایش­های فکری و فرهنگی، گرایش­های تفریحی و فعال، تقید مذهبی، سازماندهی، جامعه­پذیری، منبع کنترل درونی، آرمان خانواد، انعطاف­پذیری، سبک خانواده آزادمنش، سبک خانواده مقتدرانه، سبک خانواده مستبد، استقلال و تفرد) با هویت اخلاقی نوجوانان و ابعاد درون­سازی و نمادسازی آن بود. نمونه پژوهش شامل533 دانش­آموز دختر و پسر مقطع متوسطه شهرستان قم بود که به روش
نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای چند مرحله­ای انتخاب شدند و به پرسش‌نامه هویت اخلاقی و عملکرد خانواده بلوم (FFS) پاسخ دادند. نتایج تحلیل داده‌ها با روش رگرسیون گام به گام نشان داد مؤلفه‌‌های بیانگری، سبک فرزندپروری مقتدرانه و گرایش فکری- فرهنگی خانواده به ترتیب یبشترین قدرت پیش­بینی کنندگی را در مورد هویت اخلاقی دارند. همچنین مؤلفه‌ سبک والدگری مقتدرانه، بیانگری و تقید مذهبی خانواده، قدرت پیش­بینی­کنندگی بعد نمادسازی هویت اخلاقی را به طور معنی‌دار افزایش
می­دهند. در نهایت مؤلفه‌ بیانگری، انعطاف­پذیری و سبک والدگری مقتدرانه در مجموع حدود 6 درصد واریانس بعد درون­سازی هویت اخلاقی را تبیین می­کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Predicting adolescents’ moral identity from family function

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Some researchers suggest moral identity is an important source of moral motivation that facilitates commitment to moral behavior (Blasi, 2008; Bergman, 2008). By moral identity, we mean a commitment that emphasizes behavioral consideration and support of others’ welfare, and continues with an ongoing personal feeling about the self (Matsuba et al., 2011; Hardy, 2008; Atkins, Hart& Donnelly, 2004). The present conceptualization of moral identity has two different aspects: a) Internalization is the degree to which moral principles are central to one’s self- concept: b) Symbolization reflects the extent to which moral principles are expressed outwardly to others (Aquino & Reed, 2002). Several factors have been identified as influences on the development of moral identity, some of them are individual and some contextual. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between family functioning components (cohesion, expressiveness, agreement, intellectual, recreation and religious orientations, organization, sociability, internal locus of control, family idealization, flexibility, laissez-faire decision-making, democratic and authoritarian styles, autonomy) with moral identity of adolescent and its dimensions, internalization and symbolization.
cohesion, expressiveness, agreement, intellectual, recreation and religious orientations, organization, sociability, internal locus of control, family idealization, flexibility, laissez-faire decision-making, democratic and authoritarian styles, autonomy).
 
Research questions
According the above, the purpose of this research was to answer the following questions:
1) Dose family functioning predict moral identity of adolescents?
2) Dose family functioning predict symbolization of adolescents’ moral identity?
3) Dose family functioning predict internalization of adolescents’ moral identity?
 
Method
Current study was descriptive, a correlational study. The samples
consisted of 533 high school students (260 boys and 273 grils) that were selected by multistage random sampling method. After coordinating the research with the department of education of Qom’s quadruplet areas, one school were randomly selected from each area. One classroom from each of the first, second and third grade was randomly selected from each school and the students were administered the questionnaires.
Participants completed Aquino and Reed's Moral Identity Scale (2002) that consists of 13 items and two subscales of symbolization and internalization. Family function scale (FFS) consists of 13 subscales that reflecting family function (cohesion, expressiveness, agreement, intellectual, recreation and religious orientations, organization, sociability, internal locus of control, family idealization, flexibility, laissez-faire decision-making, democratic and authoritarian styles, autonomy).
The relationship between moral identity and family function was assessed by Pearson’s correlation. Linear regression analysis (stepwise method) was also used to assess whether family function was a significant predictor of moral identity total score and its dimensions, internalization and symbolization.
 
Results
Results of data analysis, by using stepwise regression, showed that expressiveness, democratic parenting style and intellectual orientation components had the highest predictive power on moral identity. Also democratic parenting style, expressiveness and religious orientation components, increased significantly the predictive power of symbolization of moral identity. Finally components of expression, flexibility and democratic parental style explained about 6% of the internalization variance.
 
Discussion
The results of this research indicate that democratic parenting characterized by three dimensions, responsiveness, autonomy-granting, and demandingness, seems to facilitate moral identity development (Hardy, et al., 2010). Responsiveness enables the accurate understanding and acceptance of parental moral values. When adolescents feel loved by and comfortable with their parents, they are more likely to listen to and agree with what they say and do. Autonomy-granting encourages identity exploration and commitment, including reflection on and commitment to moral principles. Demandingness helps youth understand moral principles and appreciate the consequences that follow from complying with or violating such principles (Dunn, 2014). Democratic parenting together with appropriate atmosphere for dialogue and expressing the needs and feelings in the family, and the existence of religious orientations and religious beliefs, provide the necessary grounds for moral development in adolescents. Also flexibility in responding to the need for independence of adolescents provides space for the discovery of values, internalization, and commitment to selective values, which is one of the dimensions of moral identity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • family function
  • moral identity
  • symbolization
  • internalization
  • adolescents
The Holy Qur'an, translated by Mehdi Elahi Qmshh‌Ay (1384). Qom: The Religion of Knowledge.
Nahj al-Balaghah, translated by Seyyed Ja'far Shahidi (1373). Tehran: Scientific-Cultural Publishing Company.
Aquino, K., & Reed, A .(2002).The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440.
Atkins, R., Hart, D., & Donnelly, T. M. (2008).Moral Identity Development and School Attachment. In D. K. Lapsley, & D. Narvaez (Eds), Moral development, self, and identity, (65-82). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bergman, R. (2008). Identity as motivation: Toward a theory of the moral self. In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development, self, and identity, (pp18-35). New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Blasi, A. (2008). Moral Functioning: Moral Understanding and Personality, In D. K. Lapsley & D. Narvaez (Eds), Moral development, self, and identity, (335-348). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bloom, B. L. (1985). A factor analysis of self-report measures of family functioning. Family Process, 24, 225-239.
Brody, G. H., Toneman, Z., & Flor, D. (1996). Parental religiosity family processes, and youth competence in rural, two-parent African American families. Developmental Psychology, 32, 696- 706.
Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48) 8(, 872-877.
Dunn, J. (2014). Moral Development in Early Childhood and Social Interaction in the Family. In M. R. Killen & J. R. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development, (2nded), (331-350). New York: Psychological Press.
Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R, (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity explorotion in adolescence. Child Development, 59, 415-428.
Grusec, J. E. (2014). The development of moral behavior and conscience from a socialization perspective. In M. R. Killen & J. R. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development, (2nded), (243- 267). New York: Psychological Press.
Hardy, S. A. (2008). What Is Moral Identity? In F. C. Power (Eds), A handbook of moral education, (289-291). London: Praeger.
Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development, 48, 232–256.
Hardy, S. A., Hattacharjee, A., Reed, A., & Aquino, A. (2010). Moral identity and psychological distance: The case of adolescent parental socialization, Journal of Adolescence, 33, 111-123.
Kadivar, P., Islamic, A., & Farahani, M. T. (2005). Investigating the relationship between the family interaction structure (family function) and the styles of coping with the pressures of pre-university students. Journal of Psychology & Education, 34 (2), 124-97. [Persian].
Keyvan Ara, M., Esmaeili, R., & Yaghini, F. (2010). Family role in internalizing cultural values in adolescent girls 18-14 years old high school of Sheikh Fazl Noorie City of Isfahan. Sociology, 5 (2), 128-115. [Persian].
Killen M. R., Smetana, J. R. (2014).  Handbook of moral development. New York: Psychological Press .
Lapsley, D. K. (2008). Moral Self-Identity as the Aim of Education. In l. Nucci & D. Narvaez (Eds), Handbook of moral and character education, (30- 52) New York: Routledge,.
Leonard, G. R. (2010). Moral identity in adolescence: A literature review, California: University of Asuza.
Lezin, N., Lori, A., Rolleri, M., Bean, S., & Taylor, T. (2004). Parent- child connectedness: Implications for research interventions and positive impacts on adolescents. Adolescents Health, 24, 205- 221.
Majadabadi Farahani, Z. (2012). A new identity for identity research: Recommendtions for expanding and refocusing iIdentity research Literature. Journal of Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 8 (31), 314-328. [Persian].
Matsuba, M. K., Theresa, M., & Hart, D. (2011). A model of moral identity applications for education. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 40, 181-207.
Najmi, S. B. (1996) Family functioning and the adolescent social agreeability in the peer group (M.A. thesis in Psychology). Iran: Rodehen Azad University. [Persian]
Panahi, A. A. (2010). Role of involvement in religious doctrines in family education and strengthening. Journal of Moral Knowledge, 1 (2), 96-77. [Persian]
Pour Ebrahim, T., Heydari, J., & Khoshtashin, A. (2011). The relationship between child-seeking practices and identification styles and tendency to occupations in adolescents, Journal of Career and Organizational Counseling, 3 (8), 24-11. [Persian].
Sadeghi, A. (2015). Investigating the relationship between family support, self-efficacy and job self-esteem with the decision-making self-efficacy of students' career paths. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 22 (1), 227-244. [Persian].
Sepahvand, E., ShehniYalagh, M., Allipour Birgany, S., & Behroozi, N. (2017). Testing a model of causal relationships of family communication patterns, metacognition and personality traits with critical thinking disposition, mediated by epistemic beliefs of female high school students in Ahvaz.Journal of Psychological Achievements, 24 (1), 23-44. [Persian].
Tavakoli, M. G., Latifi, Z., & Amiri, SH. (2009). Various aspects of religious and ethical identity of the college students. Islamic Studies and Psychology, 3 (5), 65- 77. [Persian].
Yousefi, Z. (2012). Family functioning on the identity statues in high school boys in Isfahan, Iran. International Journal of Psychology and Counselling, 4 (10), 127-135.