دریس، عصمت (1377). بررسی تهدید به تنبیه خفیف و شدید بر نگرش نسبت به تقلب و اقدام به آن در دانش‌آموزان دختر سال سوم راهنمایی شهر اهواز. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
نعامی، عبدالزهرا (1372). بررسی تهدید به تنبیه خفیف و شدید بر نگرش نسبت به تقلب و اقدام به آن در دانش‌آموزان پسر سال سوم راهنمایی شهر اهواز. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
نعامی، عبدالزهرا، شکرکن، حسین (1376). بررسی تأثیر تهدید به تنبیه شدید در مقایسه با تهدید به تنبیه خفیف در ایجاد نگرش منفی نسبت به تقلب و اقدام به آن در دانش‌آموزان پسر سال سوم راهنمایی شهرستان اهواز. مجله علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز. بهار و تابستان، شماره‌های 1 و 2.
یعقوبی ممقانی، حسن (1374). بررسی رابطه جهت‌گیری هدفی والدین با راهبردهای یادگیری فرزندان. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه تهران.
Anderman, EM., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, 0. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84-93.
Bergias, S. & Jones, E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.
Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation:
Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 474-482.
Dweck, C.S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, EL. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
Eronen, S., Nurmi, J.E., & Salmela A., K. (1998). Optimistic, defensive- pessimistic, impulsive and self-handicapping strategies in university environments. Learning and Instruction, 8(2), 159-177.
Friedel, J., Hruda, L., & Midgley, C., (2001). When children limit their own learning: The relation between peceived parent achievement goals and children’s use of avoidance behaviors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Harachiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., John, T.M., Carter, S.M., & Elliot, A.J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Prediecting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 31 6-330.
Kaplan, A., & Midgley, C. (1997). The effect of achievement goals: Does level of academic efficacy make a difference? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 415-435.
Marachi, R., Gheen, M.H., & Midgley, C. (April, 2000). Comparisons of elementary, middle, and high school teachers’ beliefs and approaches to instruction using a goal orientation framework. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, Louisiana.
McLnerney, M.D., Roche, A.L., Mclnerney, V., & Marsh, W.H. (1997). Cross-cultural perspectives on school motivation: The Relevance and Application of Goal Theory. American Educational Research Journa4 34, 207-236.
McLnerney, M.D., Yeung, A.S., & Melnerney, V. (2001). Cross-cultural validation of the Inventory of School Motivation (ISM): Motivation orientations of Navajo and Anglo students. Journal of Applied Measurerient, 2(2), 134-152.
Meece, J.I., Blumenfeld, P.C. & Hoyle, R.H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 5 14-523.
Middleton, M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An under-explored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61-75.
Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T.C. (1996). “If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason”: Predictors of adolescents’ use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 423-434.
Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruda, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K.E., Oheen, M., Kaplan, A., Kumar, R., Middleton, M.J., Nelson, J., Roeser, R., & Urdan, T., (2000). Manual for the patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Nicholls, 1G., & Miller, A.T. (1984). Reasoning about the ability of self and others: A developmental study. Child Developmeru, 55, 1990-1999.
Oleson, K.C., Butso, N.E., Foster, J.H., Lee, E.S., Ridberg, R.B., & Seldera, M.A. (2000). Achievement goals of overachievers and seif-hadicappers. Paper presented at the l annual meeting of the society for personality and social psychology: Nashville.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P.R. (1999). The diffrential impact of extrinsic and mastery goal orientations on males’ and females’ self- regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 153-171.
Prapavessis, H., & Grove, J.R. (1998). Self-handicapping of culture and context on students’ motivational orientation: In F. Salili, C.Y. Chiu, & Y.Y. Hang (Eds.), Students motivation. The culture and context of learning (pp 221-252). New York: Planum Press.
Thompson, T., & Richardson, A. (2001). Self-handicapping status, claim self handicaps and reduce practice effort following success and failure feedback. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know. What more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 115-138.
Urdan, T. & Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journa4 35, 101-122.
Zuckerman, M., Kieffer, S.C., & Knee, R. (1998). Consequences of self-handicapping: Effects on coping, academic performance, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1619-1628.
)