Document Type : Research Article

Author

Faculty member of Department of Educational Sciences, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22055/psy.1997.16389

Abstract

For the School of Linguistic Analysis, the exclusive task of philosophy is to analyse language and what has a linguistic nature, such as concepts and propositions. Though I am not going to limit all capabilities of philosophy to this, analysing language is one of its main tasks. That is why philosophers of education try to analyse educational institutions and concepts. In this paper, I will try to analyse the concept of “Islamic University” with a view to the paradoxical meaning it may have. Some believe that for a university to be Islamic, knowledge and the scientific content of its academic curricula must be Islamic, and that is what seems to be paradoxical. This is so because based on the currently accepted meaning of ‘science’, there is a logical gap between science and value. That is, science is impartial to and independent of values. To solve this problem, we need to provide an alternative meaning for science on the basis of which science and the process of scientific research involve values.

احمدی‌، بابک‌.(1373) مدرنیته‌ و اندیشه‌ انتقادی‌، تهران‌، انتشارات‌ مرکز.
اصول‌ کافی‌
ایان‌، باربور.(1362) علم‌ و دین‌، ترجمه‌ بهاءالدین‌ فرشاهی‌، مرکز نشر دانشگاهی‌.
باقری‌، خسرو.(1375) دیدگاههای‌ جدید در فلسفه‌ تعلیم‌ و تربیت‌، تهران‌،    انتشارات‌ نقش‌ هستی‌.
صفایی‌، سیداحمد.(1359) هشام‌ بن‌الحکم‌، مدافع‌ حریم‌ ولایت‌، تهران‌، انتشارات‌ آفاق‌.
قرآن‌ کریم‌
گلدمن‌، لوسین‌.(1966) فلسفه‌ و علوم‌ انسانی‌، ترجمه‌ حسین‌ اسدپور پیرانفر(1357) تهران‌،    انتشارات‌ جاویدان‌.
 
 
       Abdullah Omar Nasseef, (1984). “Science education and religious values:
An Islamic Approach”, Muslim Education Quarterly. Vol. 1, No.3 Arbib, MA. and M.B. Hesse, (1986). The Construction of reaWy.
Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Capra, F, (1975). The Lao of physics, Shambhala Press, Berkely, CA.
Davies, P. (1983). God and the new physics. Simon & Sehuster: New York.
Davson, Galle, P. (1994). “Philosophy of science and school science”in Educatimcl Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 26. No. 1.
Hawking, S. W. (1988), A brief history of time. Bantam Books: London.
Hempel , Carl G., (1988). “ Science and human values”, in Philosophy of Science, Edited, by E.D. Klemke, R. Hollinger and A.D. Kline, Prometheus Books.
Hesse, M. B. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science, Harvester Press: Brighton, Sussex.
Hume, David, (1981). A treatise of human nature. Oxford University Press:
London.
Macintyre, Alasdair. (1981). After virtue. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana.
MacMatthews Michael, R. (1994), Science teaching, the role of history and philosophy of science. Routledge: New York.
Moore, 0. B. (1903). Principia ethica. Cambridge University Press:
Cambridge, England.
Peters, R. S. (1966). Ethics and education. George and Unwin Ltd: London.
Rudner, Richard, (1988). “ The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments “introductory readings In the Philosophy of Science Edited. by E.D. Klemke , Ct aL Prometheus Books, 327-333.
Ross, W.D. (1930). The right and the good. Oxford University press, Oxford.
Snare, Francis, (1992). The nature of moral thinking, Routledge: London.