Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer- verlag.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Bar,ron, F. X. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Barron, F. X. & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.
Boden, M. A. (1991). The creative mind: Myths & mechanisms. New York: Basic Books.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. (1994). Genes, environment, and personality. Science, 264,
Bowers, K. S., Farvolden, P., & Mermigis, L. (1995). Intuitive antecedents of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 27-51). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. psychological Review, 67,380-400.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity. In M. A. Runco & R.
S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 190-212). Newbury Park, CA:
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discoveiy and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers:
The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 55-73.
Dennis, W. (1966). Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 years. Journal of Gerontology, 21, 1-8.
Diehi, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups:
Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternherg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-396). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eisenbergcr, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth’? American Psychologist, 51, 1153-1166.
Eisenstadt, J. M. (1978). Parental loss and genius. American Psychologist, 33,
Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (1996). The road to expert peiformance: Empirical evidence from the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Mahwah, NJ: Eribaum.
Eysenck, H.. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Farr, J. L. (1990). Facilitating individual role innovation. In M. A. West & J.
L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and orgaizutional strategies (pp. 207-230). New York: Wiley.
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge. MA: Press.
Gallon, F. (1869). Hereditary genius: An inquiry into its laws and consequences.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New
York: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New
York: Basic Books.
Gedo, J. E. (1997). Psychoanalytic theories of creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.). The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 29-39). Cresskill, NJ:
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problom finding in art. New York: Wiley.
Goertzel, M. G., & Goertzel, T. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities: A psychosocial analysis of the famous. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gruber, H. B. (1989). The evolving systems approach to creative work. In D.
B. Wallace & H. B. Gruber (Eds.), creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York:
Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143-169). Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Hayes, J. R. (1989). The complete problem solver (2nd ed.). Hilisdale, NJ:
Helson, R. (1990). Creativity in women: Outer and inner views over time. In
M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 46-58). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents:
Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399-442.
Jamison, K. R. (1993). Touched with fire: Manic-depressive illness and the artistic temperament. New York: Free Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1993). Human and machine thinking. Hilisdale, NJ:
Kroeher, A. L. (1944). confIgurations of culture growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago:
University of Chicago press.
Lambert, W. B., Tucker, G. R., & d’Anglejan, A. (1973). Cognitive and attitudinal consequences of bilingual schooling: The St. Lambert project through grade five. Journal of Educational Psycholo’, 65, 141-159.
Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zythow, J. M. (1987). ScientWc discovery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lehman, H. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lindauer, M. S. (1993a). The old-age style and its artists. Empirical Studies and
the Arts, 11, 135-146
Lindauer, M. S. (1993b). The span of creativity among long-lived historical artists. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 231-239.
Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford Press.
Lykken, D. T. (1998). The genetics of genius. In A. Steptoe (Ed.), Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament in the historical record (pp. 15-37). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mackinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness. Buffalo, NY:
Creative Education Foundation.
Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R.
R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211-232). New York: Plenum Press.
Martindale, C. (1990). The clockwork muse: The predictability of artistic styles. New York: Basic Books.
Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.). The creative cognition approach (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCrae. R. R., Arenberg, D., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Declines in divergent thinking with age: Cross-sectional, and cross-sequential analyses. Psychology and Aging, 2. 130-136.
Nemeth, C. J., Kwan, J. (1987). Minority influence, divergent thinking and detection of correct solutions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17,
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs,
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3rd ed.). New York: Scribner.
Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Gamier, H. (1993). Identification of scientists making long-term, high-impact contributions, with notes on their methods of working. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 329-343.
Rothenberg, A. (1990). creativity and madness: New findings and old stereotypes.
Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Roy, M. C., Gauvin, S., & Limayem. M. (1996). Electronic group brainstorming: The role of feedback on productivity. Small Group Research,
Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoecOflOmiC approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131-147.
Schooler, J. W. & Meicher, J. (1995). The ineffability of insight. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 97-133). Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Shadish, W. R., Jr. (1989). The perception and evaluation of quality in science. In B. Gholson, W. R. Shadish, Jr., R. A. Neimeyer, & A. C. Houts (Eds.), The psychology of science: Contributions to metascience (pp. 383-426). Cambridge, England: €amtridge University Press.
Shrage, J., & Langley, P. (Eds.), (19). computational models of scientific discovery and theory formation. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmanfl.
Simonton, D. k. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistoriCal time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119-1133.
Simonton, D. k. (1976). PhilosophiCal eminence, beliefs, and Zeitgeist: An individual-generational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Simonton, D. K. (1980). Thematic fame, melodic originality, and musical
Zeitgeist: A biographical and transhistoriCal content analysis. JouriUti of Personality and Social psychology, 38, 972-983.
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, Creativity, and leadership: HistoriometriC inquiries. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1987). Developmental antecedents of achieved eminence. Annals ot Child Development, 5, 131-169.
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Age and outstanding achievement: What do we know after a century of research? Psychological Bulletin, 104, 251-267.
Simonton, D. K. (1989). The swan-song phenomenon: Last-works affects for 172 classical composers. Psychology and Aging, 4, 42-47.
Simonton, D. k. (1991a). Career landmarks in science: Individual differences and interdisciplinary contrasts. Developmental Psychology, 27, 119-130.
Simonton, D. k. (1991b). Emergence and realization of genius: The lives and works of 120 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 829-840.
Simonton, D. k. (1992a). Gender and genius in Japan: Feminine eminence in masculine culture. Sex Roles, 27, 101-119.
Simonton, D. k. (1992b). Leaders of American psychology, 1879-1967: Career development, creative output, and professional achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 5-17.
Simonton, D. k. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York:
Simonton, D. k. (1997a). Creative productivity: A predictive and explanatory model of career trajectories and landmarks. Psychological Review, 104,
Simonton, D. k. (1997b). Foreign influence and national achievement: The impact of open milieus on Japanese civilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 86-94.
Simonton, D. K. (1998). Achieved eminence in minority and majority cultures:
Convergence versus divergence in the assessments of 294 African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 804-817.
Simonton, IJ. K. (1999a). Creativity and genius. In L. Pervin & 0. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 629-652). New York: Guilforci Press.
Simontori, D. K. (1999b). Origins of genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Simonton, D. K. (1999c). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106, 435-457.
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. b., & Finke, R. A. (Eds.). (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sorokin, P. A. (1969). Society, culure, and personality. New York: Cooper Square. (Original work published 1947).
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A riarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1995). The nature of insight. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Gordeeva. T. (1996). The anatomy of impact: What makes an article influential? Psychological Science, 7, 69-75.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
Subotnik, R. f., & Arnold, K. D. (Eds.). (1994). Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Terman, L. M. (1925). Menial and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Wallace, D. B., & Gruber, H. E. (Eds.). (1989). Creative people at work Twehe cognitive case studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wailer, N. G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., & Blacker, D. M. (1993). Creativity, heritability, familiality: Which Word does not belong? Psychological Inquiry, 4, 235-237.
Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M., & Vaid, J. (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.