Psychometric Properties of Helicopter Parenting Instrument in Adolescents

Fooladi, Fatemeh; PourPshahriar, Hossien; Ebrahimi, Sara

doi:10.22055/psy.2022.38405.2734

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

¹ Department of Counseling, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran . Iran.

² Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychology,faculty of psychology and education,Department of Clinical Psychology and Consultation,, shahid beheshti university, Tehran, Iran

³ Assistant Professor, Organization for Educational Research and Planning (OERP), Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22055/psy.2022.38405.2734

Abstract

Introduction
Helicopter parenting is a unique form of parenting style that is generally described as highly intensive and highly involved with the children. A particular parenting style influences all phases of the development and lifestyle of adolescents. Helicopter parents overly protect their children from difficulties by setting some set of instructions without consideration of the uniqueness of their children. Recent literature has gotten huge attention on this parenting style and debating the pros and cons of the development of the child. Higher life satisfaction and better psychological well-being have been found in children of highly intrusive parents. When there are positive effects of helicopter parenting, there are negative outcomes and impacts that have also been studied. The difficulties in emotional regulation, academic productivity, and social skills among children raised by helicopter parenting have been reported in the literature. Low self-efficacy, lack of trust in peers, and alienation from peers has also been associated with helicopter parenting. So, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the psychometric adequacy of the perception of helicopter parenting instruments.

Method
The study population included all adolescent girls in Kerman in 1400. To collect samples, 422 of them in the age group of 18 to 15 years were selected by snowball sampling method. In the present correlation study, Adolescents responded to the 10-item helicopter parenting instrument with Pistella, Izzo, Isolani, Ioverno, and Baiocco (2020) and the 44-item Leung and Shek (2018) over parenting scale. To determine the validity coefficient of the helicopter parenting instrument from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and to check its internal consistency from Cronbach's alpha coefficient by SPSS and Amos 24 was used. Also, to study the validity of the structure of the helicopter parenting instrument, its correlation coefficient with the over-parenting scale was reported.

Results
The results of principal component analysis (PC) and varimax rotation replicated 2-factor structures: mental engagement & practical engagement in the Iranian samples. Indicators of confirmatory factor analysis also showed that the two-factor structure of the instrument has an acceptable fit with the data and the model is approved. Correlational analyses between the perception of the helicopter parenting instrument's factors and with overparenting scale's factors provided initial evidence for the perception of helicopter parenting instrument convergent validity. internal consistency for the perception of helicopter parenting instrument's factors was desirable (a=0.85).

Conclusion
In sum, these findings provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the perception of helicopter parenting instrument as an instrument to assess the helicopter parenting instrument among Iranian samples. The application of this tool at the level due to the influence of culture requires standardization at large levels and in different social contexts. Overall, the findings of the present study show that the Persian version of the perception of helicopter parenting instrument as a multidimensional self-report tool in the field of parenting studies, in terms of psychometrics to measure the multiple dimensions of helicopter parenting in Iranian girls’ adolescents, is an accurate and reliable tool. Ease of use, brevity, and evaluation of two important factors of parenting are its strengths

Keywords

References

Amirsardari, L., Esmali, A., & Khademi, A. (2016). Psychometric properties of young parenting inventory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(1), 1-10.

Arnold, D. S., O'Leary, S. G., Wolff, L. S., & Acker, M. M. (1993). The parenting scale: A measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 137-147.

Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 27-42.

Farahani, M., Basaknezad, S., Davoodi, I. (2013). The Effectiveness of Stress Management Group Training on Aggression, Parental Stress and Mental Health in Mothers of Children with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 20(2), 217-232.

Fortuna, E. (2016). The Turkish translation, reliability, validity study of helicopter parenting instrument. Unpublished Master Thesis, Near East University.

Gafur, A., & Kurukkan, A. (2014). Construction and validation of a scale of parenting style. Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences, 2, 315-323.

Galesic, M., & Bosnjak, M. (2009). Effects of questionnaire length on participation and indicators of response quality in a web survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(2), 349-360.

Ganaprakasam, C., Davaidass, K. S., & Muniandy, S. C. (2018). Helicopter parenting and psychological consequences among adolescents. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 8(6), 378-382.

Ghorbani, A., & Juma Nia, S. (2018). The role of social factors (family, school, and peer group) in the socialization of students in Golestan province. Applied Sociology, 29(2), 113-128. [Persian]

Hajkhodadadi, D., Etemadi, O., Abedi, M., & Jazayeri, R. (2021). Father involvement: the role of marital adjustment, mother-adolescent relationship quality and father's level of education. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 28(1), 241-262. [Persian]

Hawk, C. K., & Holden, G, W. (2006). Meta-Parenting: an initial investigation into a new parental social cognition construct parenting. Science and Practice, 6(4), 321–342.

Hirsch, D., & Goldberg, E. (2010). Hovering practices in and outside the classroom, time to land? About Campus, 14(6), 30-32.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.

Julaieha, S., Zare. H., & Mousavi, S. (2017). Evaluation of psychometric properties of the meta-parenting questionnaire. PSJ, 16(1), 42-48. [Persian]

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd Ed). New York, NY: Guilford.

Kwon, K. A., Yoo, G., & De Gagne, J. C. (2017). Does culture matter? A qualitative inquiry of helicopter parenting in Korean American college students. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(7), 1979-1990.

Kwon, K., Yoo, G., & Bingham, G. (2016). Helicopter parenting in emerging adulthood: support or barrier for Korean college students’ psychological adjustment? Journal of Child & Family Studies, 25(1), 136-145.

Lemoyne, T., & Buchanan, T. (2011). Does “hovering” matter? helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. Sociological Spectrum: Mid-South Sociological Association, 31(2), 399-418.

Leung, C., & Tsang Kit, M. S. (2014). Parenting style. in: Michal’s ac, editor. encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research Dordrecht. Springer Netherlands, 16(3), 311-319.

Leung, J. T., & Shek, D. T. (2018). Validation of the perceived Chinese overparenting scale in emerging adults in Hong Kong. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(1), 103-117.

Locke. J. Y., Campbell. M. A., & Kavanagh, D. (2012). Can a parent do too much for their child? an examination by parenting professionals of the concept of overparenting. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 22(2), 249-265.

Luebbe, A. M., Mancini, K. J., Kiel, E. J., Spangler, B. R., Semlak, J. L., & Fussner, L. M. (2018). The dimensionality of helicopter parenting and relations to emotional, decision-making, and academic functioning in emerging adults. Assessment, 25(7), 841-857.

Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation. London, New Delhi, Sage Publication, 466-485.

Nabavi Hesar, J., Arefi, M., & Yousefi, N. (2018). Comparing the efficacy of family therapy based on Bowen’s family systems theory and logo therapy on dyadic adjustment and clients’ divorce tendencies. IJFP, 4(2), 43-60. [Persian]

Odenweller, K. G., Booth-Butterfield, M., & Weber, K. (2014). Investigating helicopter parenting, family environments, and relational outcomes for millennials. Communication Studies, 65(4), 407-425.

Perry, N. B., Dollar, J. M., Calkins, S. D., Keane, S. P., & Shanahan, L. (2018). Childhood self-regulation is a mechanism through which early overcontrolling parenting is associated with adjustment in preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54(8), 1542-1554.

Pistella, J., Izzo, F., Isolani, S., Ioverno, S., & Baiocco, R. (2020). Helicopter mothers and helicopter fathers:Italiann adaptation and validation of the helicopter parenting instrument. Psychology Hub, 37(1), 37-46.

Rahmanian, M., Zare, H., & Pour Kashani, A. (2019). Comparison of the effect of transactional analysis with emotion regulation strategies on irrational beliefs and decision-making styles in female adolescents. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 26(2), 27-48. [Persian]

Rather, S. (2017). Literature review: ramification of helicopter parenting on adolescents and emerging adults. Doctoral Dissertation, Leeds Beckett University.

Rousseau, S., & Scharf, M. (2018). Why people helicopter parents? an actor–partner interdependence study of maternal and paternal prevention/ promotion focus and interpersonal/ self-regret. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(7), 919-935.

Schiffrin, H. H., Erchull, M. J., Sendrick, E., Yost, J. C., Power, V., & Saldanha, E. R. (2019). The effects of maternal and paternal helicopter parenting on the self-determination and well-being of emerging adults. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(12), 3346-3359.

Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-Mclean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? the effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548-557.

Segrin, C., Givertz, M., Swaitkowski, P., & Montgomery, N. (2015). Overparenting is associated with child problems and a critical family environment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(2), 470-479.

Segrin, C., Woszidlo, A., Givertz, M., Bauer, A., & Taylor Murphy, M. (2012). The association between overparenting, parent child communication, and entitlement and adaptive traits in adult children. Family Relations, 61(2), 237-252.

Shek, D. T., & Law, M. Y. (2014). Parental behavioral control, parental psychological control and parent-child relational qualities: Relationships to Chinese adolescent risk behavior. Chinese Adolescents in Hong Kong, 26(5), 51-69.

Srivastav, D., & Mathur, M. L. (2020). Helicopter parenting and adolescent development: from the perspective of mental health. In parenting studies from an ecocultural and transactional perspective. IntechOpen.

Tanhaye Reshvanloo, F., Saeidi Rezvani, T., & Kareshki, H. (2019). The canonical correlation between perceptions of parents and psychological and social well-being in students. Sheik Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 6(5), 141-155. [Persian]

Van Ingen, D. J., Freiheit, S. R., Steinfeldt, J. A., Moore, L. L., Wimer, D. J., Knutt, A. D., & Roberts, A. (2015). Helicopter parenting: the effect of an overbearing caregiving style on peer attachment and self‐efficacy. Journal of College Counseling, 18(1), 7-20.

Psychometric Properties of Helicopter Parenting Instrument in Adolescents

References

References

Volume 30, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29January 2023Pages 59-78

Volume 30, Issue 1 - Serial Number 29
January 2023
Pages 59-78