نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانش‌آموخته دکتری ، گروه روتنشناسی، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی ، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا ، همدان، ایران

2 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصاد، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

3 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم اقتصادی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران.

4 دانشیار، گروه روان شناسی.، دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی ، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا ، همدان، ایران

چکیده

هوش کلامی با حساسیت نسبت به معنی و ترتیب واژه‌ها و استفاده‌های گوناگون از زبان تعریف می‌شود. پژوهش حاضر با هدف مقایسه‌ میزان فعالیت ساختارهای مغزی مهارت خواندن، نوشتن و صحبت ‌کردن در افراد با هوش‌کلامی خیلی ‌بالا و خیلی ‌پایین انجام شد. روش پژوهش حاضر یک طرح موردی بود. از میان 45 داوطلب زن و مرد 18 سال به بالا که در سال 1399 به آزمایشگاه ملی  نقشه‌­برداری مغز تهران مراجعه کردند، دو آزمودنی با هوش‌کلامی خیلی ‌بالا و خیلی ‌پایین به روش هدفمند و با استفاده از مقیاس ارزیابی رشدی هوش‌های چندگانه انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، تکالیف خواندن، نوشتن و صحبت ‌کردن بود. همچنین از تصویر‌سازی تشدید مغناطیس‌ کارکردی جهت بررسی میزان فعالیت مناطق ‌مغزی استفاده شد. داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار SPM نسخه12، پیش ‌پردازش و آنالیز آماری شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد که فرد با هوش‌کلامی خیلی ‌بالا نسبت به فرد با هوش‌کلامی خیلی ‌پایین، در تکالیف خواندن و نوشتن و صحبت ‌کردن میزان فعالیت بیشتری را در اسکنر نشان می‌دهد. با توجه به یافته‌های به دست آمده می‌توان گفت میزان فعالیت ساختارهای مغزی مرتبط با هوش ‌کلامی در افراد با هوش‌ کلامی خیلی ‌بالا بیش از افراد دارای هوش‌ کلامی خیلی ‌پایین است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing the Level of Activity of Brain Structures of Reading, Writing and Speech Skills in People with Very High and Very Low Verbal Intelligence Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

نویسندگان [English]

  • zohre yarmohammadi 1
  • Abolghasem Yaghoobi 2
  • khosro Rashid 3
  • rasol kord noghabi 4

1 1- P.hd Graduate of Agronomy, Department of psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Science , University of Bu Ali Sina, Hamedan, Iran

2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, University of Bu- Ali Sina, Hamedan, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of psychology, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, University of Bu- Ali Sina, Hamedan, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
In today's modern world where people tend to judge others by the way they speak, write, and understand words, verbal intelligence is very valuable. A literature review of 28 studies introduced the temporal cortex as the most dominant primary region for verbal intelligence. Dominant sub-regions in both the temporal and frontal cortex are critical for language processing, speech control, and speech production. Also, the temporal cortex was recognized as an important area for verbal intelligence. Since then, the neuroscience of the skills of this intelligence has been considered an important issue for psychologists and neurologists, and few studies have investigated the neuroscience of this intelligence based on its skills, and the studies have been carried out in a scattered manner. Among the research conducted on this topic, we can mention the examination of speech, writing, and reading skills.
 
Method
This research was among case studies. The statistical population of the


present study was composed of 45 male and female volunteers aged 18 years and older who were referred to the National Brain Mapping Laboratory in Tehran in 2019, and among them, two subjects were selected in a targeted manner using the developmental assessment scale of multiple intelligences. Multiple intelligences developmental assessment scales were selected.
 
Results
The findings from data processing showed that performing the reading task was associated with the activity of the frontal and prefrontal areas as well as the temporal and fusiform gyri. Findings related to the writing task also showed that doing the task was associated with the activity of the Temporal, and Prefrontal areas, especially the inferior and middle frontal gyri. Also, the findings from data processing related to the speech task showed that the frontal and temporal regions as well as the precentral and postcentral gyrus were associated with the activity. Diagram 3 shows that the activity level of brain regions in a subject with very high intelligence is higher in all regions except for the fusiform gyrus.
 
Discussion
This study, like other studies, was accompanied by limitations, for example, the limitation in the number of subjects due to the high cost of fMRI and the time limit of assignments. Therefore, it is suggest to conduct research in a larger sample for better generalizability.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Brain structures
  • functional magnetic resonance imaging
  • reading
  • speaking
  • verbal intelligence
  • writing
Behroozmand, R., Shebek, R., Hansen, D. R., Oya, H., Robin, D. A., Howard III, M., & Greenlee, J. D. (2015). Sensory–motor networks involved in speech production and motor control: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 109(1), 418-428.
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cereb Cortex, 19(12), 2767-2796.
Church, J. A., Balota, D. A., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2011). Manipulation of length and lexicality localizes the functional neuroanatomy of phonological processing in adult readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(6), 1475-1493.
Graves, W. W., Desai, R., Humphries, C., Seidenberg, M. S., & Binder, J. R. (2010). Neural systems for reading aloud: A multiparametric approach. Cerebral Cortex, 20(8), 1799-1815.
Handayania, R., Sakkirb, G., & Kasman, R. (2021). The influence of verbal-linguistic intelligence on students learning outcomes in english at SMA Negeri 1 Sidrap. Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 1(2), 141-148.
Hickok, G., Houde, J., & Rong, F. (2011). Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization. Neuron, 69(3), 407-422.
Howard-Jones, P. A., Blakemore, S. J., Samuel, E. A., Summers, I. R., & Claxton, G. (2005). Semantic divergence and creative story generation: an fMRI investigation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 25(1), 240-250.
Karami, J., Momeni, K., & Abbasi, Z. (2017). The effectiveness of metacognitive strategies and working memory training on reading performance (accuracy, speed and comprehension) of students with dyslexia. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 4(2), 51-68. [Persian]
Lee, Y. S., Turkeltaub, P., Granger, R., & Raizada, R. D. (2012). Categorical speech processing in Broca’s Area: An fMRI study using multivariate pattern-bbased analysis. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(11), 3942-3948.
Longcamp, M., Lagarrigue, A., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., Anton, J. L., Alario, F. X., & Velay, J. L. (2014). Functional specificity in the motor system: Evidence from coupled fMRI and kinematic recordings during letter and digit writing. Human Brain Mapping, 35(12), 6077-6087.
Parkinson, A. L., Flagmeier, S. G., Manes, J. L., Larson, C. R., Rogers, B., & Robin, D. A. (2012). Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production. Neuroimage, 61(1), 314-322.
Preston, J. L., Molfese, J. P., Frost, S. J., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Hoeft, F., Landi, N., Shankweiler, D., & Pugh, K. R. (2015). Print-speech convergence predicts future reading outcomes in early readers. Psychological Science, 27(1), 213-234.
Pugh, K. R., Landi, N., Preston, J. L., Mencl, W. E., Austin, A. C., Sibley, D., & Frost, S. J. (2013). The relationship between phonological and auditory processing and brain organization in beginning readers. Brain & Language, 125(2), 173-183.
Shah, C., Erhard, K., Ortheil, H. J., Kaza, E., Kessler, C., & Lotze, M. (2013). Neural correlates of creative writing an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 34(5), 1088-1101.  
Shearer, C. B. (2019). A detailed neuroscientific framework for the multiple intelligences: Describing the neural components for specific skill units within each intelligence. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 11(3), 186-212.
Shearer, C. B., & Karanian, J. M. (2017). The neuroscience of intelligence: Empirical support for the theory of multiple intelligences? Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6(1), 211-223.
Toprak, T. E. (2018). Connectionism, artificial neural networks and reading. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 276-283.
Vogel, A. C., Church, J. A., Power, J. D., Miezin, F. M., Steven E. Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2013). Functional network architecture of reading-related regions across development. Brain & Language, 125(2), 231-243.
Zheng, Z. Z., Vicente-Grabovetsky, A., MacDonald, E. N., Munhall, K. G., Cusack, R., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2013). Multivoxel patterns reveal functionally differentiated networks underlying auditory feedback processing of speech. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 33(10), 4339-4348.