دست‌آوردهای روان‌شناختی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

راهنمایی مقالات به زبان انگلیسی

فرم های نشریه

راهنمای تهیه مقاله

راهنمای دریافت گزارش همانندجویی

راهنمای دریافت کد (ORCID)

The Effect of Cognitive Load on Reaction to the Other's Trust: The Moderating Role of Personality Traits

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

3 M.Sc. Graduate of General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

4 M.Sc. Graduate of Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

5 M.Sc. Graduate of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Fars, Iran

چکیده

Aim: The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of cognitive load on reaction to the other's trust, with the moderating role of personality traits.
Methods: Using available sampling method 85 at Persian Gulf University were selected and were asked to complete the HEXACO personality inventory. Then, using random assignment method, they were divided into four groups (four levels of cognitive load from no cognitive load to high cognitive load. Finally, participants were asked to complete a scenario that examined reaction to other's trust, under a variety of degrees of cognitive loads, mentioned above. The data were analyzed using hierarchical regression analysis (utilizing Baron and Keaney's method for assessing moderating effect).
 
Results: The results indicated that cognitive load causes a decrease in reaction to other's trust (R=0.683) and that each personality trait could moderate the effect of cognitive load on reaction to other’s trust.
Conclusion: Considering the ever-increasing cognitive load caused by the explosion of information in the modern age, it is necessary to identify and strengthen the personality traits underlying trusting interpersonal relationships

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Cognitive Load on Reaction to the Other's Trust: The Mediating Role of Personality Traits

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Pakizeh 1
  • Sadegh Hekmatiyan fard 2
  • Sara Mansourizadeh 3
  • Adel Heydari 4
  • Hossein Rahiminejad 5

1 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

2 Ph.D. Student, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

3 M.Sc. Graduate of General Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran.

4 M.Sc. Graduate of Educational Psychology, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran

5 M.Sc. Graduate of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Fars, Iran

چکیده [English]

Aim: The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of cognitive load on reaction to the other's trust, with the moderating role of personality traits.
Methods: Using available sampling method 85 at Persian Gulf University were selected and were asked to complete the HEXACO personality inventory. Then, using random assignment method, they were divided into four groups (four levels of cognitive load from no cognitive load to high cognitive load. Finally, participants were asked to complete a scenario that examined reaction to other's trust, under a variety of degrees of cognitive loads, mentioned above. The data were analyzed using hierarchical regression analysis (utilizing Baron and Keaney's method for assessing moderating effect).
Results: The results indicated that cognitive load causes a decrease in reaction to other's trust (R=0.683) and that each personality trait could moderate the effect of cognitive load on reaction to other’s trust.
Conclusion: Considering the ever-increasing cognitive load caused by the explosion of information in the modern age, it is necessary to identify and strengthen the personality traits underlying trusting interpersonal relationships

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Cognitive load
  • personality traits
  • reaction to trust
  • students
مراجع
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., ... & De Raad, B. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356.‏
Basharpour, S., Taherifard, M., & Mohammadi, G. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the Persian form of the HEXACO-24 Personality Inventory. Journal of Educational Assessment, 9(36), 65-89.
Badleh, A., Tomaj, A. J., & Ghobadian, M. (2021). The effect of teaching methods based on cognitive load and augmented reality technology on students' learning and memorization in mathematics, lesson Research in lesson planning, 41(18), 177-163.
Biranvand, A., Golshani, M., Akbarnejad, R., & Rafiee, Z. (2021). The Role of Organizational Trust in the Transfer of Tacit Knowledge (Case Study: Public Libraries of Fars Province). Research on Information Science and Public Libraries, 27(2), 253-269.‏
Carter, G. (2019). Stability and Interpersonal Trust: A Critical Relationship.‏
Clark, R. C., Nguyen, F., & Sweller, J. (2011). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. John Wiley & Sons.‏
Daronnat, S., Azzopardi, L., Halvey, M., & Dubiel, M. (2021). Inferring Trust From Users’ Behaviours; Agents’ Predictability Positively Affects Trust, Task Performance and Cognitive Load in Human-Agent Real-Time Collaboration. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 8, 194.‏
De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105-134.‏
De Vries, R. E. (2013). The 24-item brief HEXACO inventory (BHI). Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 871-880.‏
Dinesen, P. T., Nørgaard, A. S., & Klemmensen, R. (2014). The civic personality: Personality and democratic citizenship. Political Studies, 62, 134-152.‏
Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive psychology: A student’handbook. Psychology press.‏
Fraser, K., Ma, I., Teteris, E., Baxter, H., Wright, B., & McLaughlin, K. (2012). Emotion, cognitive load and learning outcomes during simulation training. Medical Education, 46(11), 1055-1062.‏
Freitag, M., & Bauer, P. C. (2016). Personality traits and the propensity to trust friends and strangers. The Social Science Journal, 53(4), 467-476.‏
Helfat, C. E., & Martin, J. A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1281-1312.‏
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. Random House Trade.‏
Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(3), 490.‏
Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329-358.‏
Mahboubi, T.,  Zare H., &  Fardanesh, H. (2013). Effectiveness ofeducational design principles (14) Marinbor and (Kester) multimedia principle on cognitive load and learning of learning subjects in multimedia environments, Educational Psychology Quarterly, 30(9), 165-186.
Pakizeh, A., Hekmatiyan, Fard, S., Mansourzadeh, S., & Heydari, A. (2022). The effect of cognitive load on trust in others: Investigating the moderating role of personality excellence, Journal of Psychology, 102(2), 130-139.
Samson, K., & Kostyszyn, P. (2015). Effects of cognitive load on trusting behavior–an experiment using the trust game. PloS one, 10(5), e0127680.‏
Schilke, O., & Huang, L. (2018). Worthy of swift trust? How brief interpersonal contact affects trust accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(11), 1181.‏
Simone, A. C., Yu, S., & Hamza, C. A. (2022). Understanding experiences of disclosing and receiving disclosures of nonsuicidal self-injury amongst peers in university: A qualitative investigation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 1-23.‏
Sillitoe, A. W. B. (2018). Building Trust between Virtual Agents and Humans: The effect of imitation on interpersonal trust and trustworthiness.‏
Solso, R. L., MacLin, M. K., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Cognitive psychology. Pearson Education New Zealand.‏
Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 9-31.‏
Symington, N. (2018). The psychology of the person. Routledge.‏
Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (2017). The social psychology of groups. Routledge.‏
Tov, W., Nai, Z. L., & Lee, H. W. (2016). Extraversion and agreeableness: Divergent routes to daily satisfaction with social relationships. Journal of Personality, 84(1), 121-134.‏
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, W. K., & Carter, N. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972–2012. Psychological Science, 25(10), 1914-1923.‏
Vollrath, M., & Torgersen, S. (2000). Personality types and coping. Personality and Individual Differences, 29(2), 367-378.‏
دست‌آوردهای روان‌شناختی
دوره 30، ویژه نامه انگلیسی
مرداد 1402
صفحه 1-10
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 08 تیر 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 19 فروردین 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 09 اردیبهشت 1402
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار