نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

2 استاد، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران

4 کارشناسی ارشد رواشناسی بالینی کودک و نوجوان، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

5 استادیار، گروه روانپزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران. ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر در پی بررسی نقش خودشیفتگی خودبزرگ‌بین و خودشیفتگی آسیب‌پذیر در پیش‌بینی راهبردهای خود ابرازی در دانشجویان دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز بود. روش تحقیق توصیفی و از نوع همبستگی کانونی (کانونی) و جامعه آماری آن شامل کلیه دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی بوده که در سال 96-97 مشغول به تحصیل بودند (N=1500). به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی چندمرحله‌ای نمونه از میان جامعه موردنظر انتخاب شد (n=222). ابزار گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسشنامه خودشیفتگی مرضی و مقیاس راهبردهای خود ابرازی بود. یافته‌ها نشان داد که ترکیب خطی راهبردهای خود ابرازی دفاعی و اظهار وجودی به‌وسیله ترکیب خطی متغیرهای پیش‌بین قابل پیش‌بینی است. بدین‌صورت که متغیرهای پیش‌بین 28 درصد از واریانس متغیرهای ملاک را تبیین می‌کنند. درمجموع، یافته‌ها نشان دادند که انواع خودشیفتگی (خودبزرگ‌بین و آسیب‌پذیر) بر اساس نوع و میزان استفاده از انواع راهبردهای خود ابرازی (دفاعی و اظهار وجودی) قابل پیش‌بینی است. پیشنهاد می‌شود متخصصان بالینی به انواع خودشیفتگی و نحوه راهبردهای خود ابرازی مراجعین دارای اختلال شخصیت خودشیفتگی جهت شناخت و درک بیشتر این افراد توجه ویژه مبذول دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissism in Predicting Self-Presentation Tactics in Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mona Mohammadi 1
  • Mahnaz Mehrabizadeh Honarmand 2
  • Iran Davoudi 3
  • Saeid Afrozpour 4
  • Mehdi Soleimani 5

1 M.A Clinical Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

4 M.A Clinical Psychology of Children and Adolescent, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran

5 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
In recent years, studies in the field of narcissism have received increasing attention from researchers, but despite the growing interest in the concept of narcissism, there are many unanswered questions, especially about the nature of this structure. A review of clinical research on narcissism and narcissistic personality pathology shows that there are two narcissistic phenotypes, grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism. Grandiose narcissism is defined as a grandiose notion of oneself, disrespecting others, and being entitled and includes characteristics such as self-arrogance, pretentiousness, and dominance. Feelings of anger, despair, emptiness, low self-esteem and even suicide when they fail are common experiences of these people. At the interpersonal level, people with these characteristics withdraw from interpersonal relationships due to sensitivity to rejection and criticism. In contrast, the vulnerable type is not obvious most of the time and is characterized by a strong need for approval, admiration from others and sensitivity to rejection. These people have a negative self-concept, and their sense of self-worth depends on the approval of others, and if they do not receive it, they avoid people and social relationships. Considering the difference between these two types of narcissism, its further investigation and recognition in different interpersonal contexts leads to more accurate clinical diagnosis and more specialized services. One of the structures that can be related to types of narcissism is self-presentation guides. Narcissistic people use self-presentation tactics more than others due to their high need to influence others. The present study aimed to investigate the role of grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism in predicting self-presentation tactics in students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz.
 
Method
The descriptive research method of conventional (focal) correlation and its statistical population are all graduate students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz who were studying in 1996-97 (N = 1500). After obtaining the necessary permits from Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, the questionnaires were distributed among the selected students based on a multi-stage cluster random sampling method. Data were analyzed by SPSS statistical software. A total of 250 students were randomly selected based on Cochran's formula according to the size of the population, in a multi-stage cluster method. Finally, by stratified random sampling method, the sample size was selected from the target population (n = 222). Collection tools included a pathological narcissism questionnaire (Pincus et al., 2009) and a scale of self-Presentation tactics (Tedeschi & Melburg, 1984). The pathological narcissism questionnaire contains 52 descriptive questions. This questionnaire has seven subscales, including self-concealment, devaluation, conditional self-respect, self-improvement with self-sacrifice, exploitation, grandiose fantasy, and righteous anger. These seven subscales are in two higher-level dimensions of grandiose narcissism with the components of exploitation, self-enhancement with selflessness and grandiose fantasy, and vulnerable narcissism with the components of self-concealment, conditioned self-esteem, justified anger, and devaluation, all of which subscales are identified as pathological narcissism. The self-expression questionnaire is a paper-and-pencil tool that contains 63 questions and 12 components. Questionnaire of self-presentation tactics, five types of defensive self-presentation tactics, including: non-responsibility, self-incapacitation, excuse, apology and justification, and 7 self-presentation tactics of self-expression including: request, exaggeration, intimidation, humiliation, entitlement, role model and examines self-indulgence.
 
Results
The results showed that the linear combination of defensive and assertive self-presentation tactics can be predicted by the linear combination of predictor variables. The significance of the whole model showed that there is a significant relationship between the two variables of self-Presentation tactics and existential expression with grandiose and vulnerable narcissis (P<0.005). Predictive variables explain 28% of the variance of the criterion variables. Overall, the findings showed that the types of narcissism (grandiose and vulnerable) can be predicted based on the type and extent of using different types of self-presentation tactics (defensive and assertiveness). Of the two criterion variables, presentation tactics are more important in the linear criterion variable. On the other hand, in the first function, among the predictor variables, the narcissistic narcissist has the largest share in the linear composition of its category. In other words, the first function of self-Presentation tactics is predicted by grandiose narcissism. In explaining the results of the present study, it seems that people with grandiose narcissism had a greater tendency to use defensive self-expression and self-presentation tactics than vulnerable narcissists. In grandiose narcissism, insecurity (e.g., fear of negative evaluation) is very important. Deep feelings of inadequacy and psychological insecurity in narcissism lead to the tendency of narcissistic people to use defensive self-presentation tactics.
 
Discussion
According to the findings of the present study, it is suggested that clinical specialists pay special attention to the types of narcissism and the self-presentation tactics of clients with narcissistic personality disorder in order to know and understand more about these people
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Grandiose narcissism
  • narcissism
  • self-presentation tactics
  • vulnerability narcissism
Adams, J. M., Hart, W., & Burton, K. A. (2015). I only like the idea of you: Narcissists tolerate others’ narcissistic traits but not their corresponding behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 82, 232-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.019
Alipour, M. (2015). Strategies of self-defense and existential expression predicting the dimensions of social anxiety in students of Chamran University of Ahvaz. (PhD of Psychology). Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. https://doi.org/10.22055/jacp.2022.41310.1242 [Persian]
Aminian Dehkordi, F., Ramazani, K., & Mardpour, A. (2021). Effectiveness of empathy skills training on the narcissism and bullying in bullying student. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 28(2), 67-92. https://doi.org/10.22055/psy.2021.34832.2595 [Persian]
Amiri, S., Ghasemi navab, A. (2017). Emotion and emotion regulation beliefs as a moderator between morningness-eveningness and dark traits: a study on normal population. Journal of Psychological Achievements,           25(1),       113-128. https://doi.org/10.22055/psy.2018.23424.1892 [Persian]
Asgari, M., Kolae, A., & Pour Mosavi, M. (2021). Validation and validation of the narcissism questionnaire in cyberspace. Quarterly Journal of Educational Measurement, 10(40), 227-246. https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2020.50635.2018 [Persian]
Cano, M. (2019). Instagram & beauty micro-influencers: Strategies of self-presentation used for personal brand development. University of Oregon Administration, USA. https://hdl.handle.net/1794/24859
Emadi, Z. (2013). Evaluation of self-expression and self-review strategies in patients with social anxiety and normal individuals. (Master Thesis. Clinical Psychology). Shiraz University. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/edcbmj.11.01.12 [Persian]
Fakoor Saghih, A. M., Ghaviheykal, M., & Ilani, R. (2020). Investigating the effect of consumers’ need for uniqueness on their purchasing behavior through self-‌expression and self-presentation. New Marketing Research Journal, 10(4), 17-36. [Persian] 10.22108/nmrj.2020.123811.2176
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. London: Penguin.
Hart, W., Adams, J., Burton, K. A., & Tortoriello, G. K. (2017). Narcissism and self-presentation: Profiling grandiose and vulnerable Narcissists' self-presentation tactic use. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 48-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.062
Hasanzadeh, F., & Asghar Nejad Farid, A. A. (2019). The investigation of the mediating role of perfectionism between narcissism, and social avoidance. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, 62(December), 102-112. 10.22038/mjms.2019.14109 [Persian]
Hekmati, I., Babpour, J., & Imani, M. (2021). The correspondence of DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders with grandiose and vulnerable narcissism. Journal of Psychological Studies, 17(2), 33-54. 10.22051/psy.2021.32644.2290 [Persian]
Heydari Nasab, L. (2007). Comparison of defense mechanisms in clinical and non-clinical samples based on standardization and psychometric findings based on the Iranian questionnaire of defense disciplines DSQ. Doctoral dissertation of Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian]
Khodabakhsh Pirklany, R., & Safaeian, E. (2020). Comparing the defense styles and the self-conscious affect of shame and guilt in subtypes of narcissism and comparison with ordinary people. Journal of Psychological Studies, 15(4), 7-24. https://www.magiran.com/p2141539 [Persian]
Khodabandelow, S., & Rahimian Boogar, I. (2018). The study of etiology and development of narcissism in psychodynamic perspective. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal (RRJ), 7(4), 195-212. http://frooyesh.ir/article-1-1114-en.html [Persian]
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2017). Controversies in narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 291-315. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244
Perry, J. C., & Bond, M. (2005). Defensive functioning. In J. M. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. S. Bender (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of personality disorders (pp. 523–540). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-05013-033
Perry, J. C., Presniak, M. D., & Olson, T. R. (2013). Defense mechanisms in schizotypal, borderline, antisocial, and narcissistic personality disorders. Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 76(1), 32-52. 10.1521/psyc.2013.76.1.32
Pincus, A. L., Ansell, E. B., Pimentel, C. A., Cain, N. M., Wright, A. G. C., & Levy, K. N. (2009). Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 21(3), 365-379. 10.1037/a0016530
Ritzl, A., Csukly, G., Balázs, K., & Égerházi, A. (2018). Facial emotion recognition deficits and alexithymia in borderline, narcissistic, and histrionic personality disorders. Psychiatry Research, 270, 154-159. 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.017
Sabini, J. (1995). Prejudice and intergroup conflict. In J. Sabini: Social Psychology. New York, WW Norton & Company.
Shehni Yeylagh, M., & Basak Nejad, S. (2007). Investigating the relationship between various types of self-defense strategies and the syndrome of hypocrisy. Two Quarterly Journal of Clinical Psychology and Personality (Behavior Scholar), 1(25), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.22055/jacp.2022.41310.1242 [Persian]
Soleimani, M., Past, N., Molae, M., Mohammadi, A., Dashti Pour, M., & Safa, Y. (2015). Psychometric properties of the pathological narcissism scale. Contemporary Psychology, 10(1), 95-110. [Persian]
Tedeschi, J. T., & Melburg, V. (1984). Impression managment and impudence in the organization. Research in the Sociology of Organization, 3, 31-58.
Zalpour, K., Shahidi, S., Zarrani, F., Mazaheri, M. A., & Heidari, M. (2016). Aggression and interpersonal problems in students with and without pathological grandiose and vulnerable narcissistic traits. Clinical Psychology Studies, 6(22), 1-18. [Persian]
Zeng, F., Li, W., Wang, V. L., & Guo, C. (2019). The impact of advertising self-presentation style on customer purchase intention. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(6), 1242-1245. DOI:10.1108/APJML-03-2019-0150