نوع مقاله : ویژه نامه به زبان انگلیسی

نویسنده

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

چکیده

Background: Procrastination or voluntary delay in doing an important and necessary activity, despite the expected negative consequences that outnumber the positive consequences of delay, is a common phenomenon in the modern society. On the basis of various data, procrastination affects 20 to 95 percent of adults in western countries and studying this phenomenon is very important.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties and the factor structure of temporal focus scale and to study the mediating role of temporal focus in the relationship between procrastination and impulsivity- delay discounting.
Methods: Four hundred people (279 females and 121 males) were selected through convenience sampling from universities of Kermanshah (west of Iran). They were evaluated by questionnaires of impulsivity, monetary-choice, pure procrastination, and temporal focus. Data were analyzed based on Cronbach's alpha test, intra-class and Pearson correlation tests, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling using SPSS and Mplus software.
Results: The results showed that the reliability of the temporal focus scale was appropriate using all three measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91), split-half reliability (Guttman split-half coefficient = 0.90), and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.78). Exploratory factor analysis led to the expected three-factor structure. The proposed model fitted well with the data. Temporal focus, urgency, and delay discounting had direct effects, and urgency and lack of perseverance had indirect effects (due to temporal focus) on procrastination.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the temporal focus scale has acceptable validity and reliability, and given the little time it takes to be filled out, it can be a proper tool to be used in various situations. Temporal focus, especially focusing on the past, plays a unique role in negligence, and a closer examination of this variable may help to better understand the underlying mechanisms of procrastination.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Temporal Focus Scale: Factor structure and Mediating Role in the Relationship between Impulsive Choice and Procrastination

نویسنده [English]

  • Hashem Jebraeili

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Background: Procrastination or voluntary delay in doing an important and necessary activity, despite the expected negative consequences that outnumber the positive consequences of delay, is a common phenomenon in the modern society. On the basis of various data, procrastination affects 20 to 95 percent of adults in western countries and studying this phenomenon is very important.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties and the factor structure of temporal focus scale and to study the mediating role of temporal focus in the relationship between procrastination and impulsivity- delay discounting.
Methods: Four hundred people (279 females and 121 males) were selected through convenience sampling from universities of Kermanshah (west of Iran). They were evaluated by questionnaires of impulsivity, monetary-choice, pure procrastination, and temporal focus. Data were analyzed based on Cronbach's alpha test, intra-class and Pearson correlation tests, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling using SPSS and Mplus software.
Results: The results showed that the reliability of the temporal focus scale was appropriate using all three measures of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91), split-half reliability (Guttman split-half coefficient = 0.90), and test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation = 0.78). Exploratory factor analysis led to the expected three-factor structure. The proposed model fitted well with the data. Temporal focus, urgency, and delay discounting had direct effects, and urgency and lack of perseverance had indirect effects (due to temporal focus) on procrastination.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the temporal focus scale has acceptable validity and reliability, and given the little time it takes to be filled out, it can be a proper tool to be used in various situations. Temporal focus, especially focusing on the past, plays a unique role in negligence, and a closer examination of this variable may help to better understand the underlying mechanisms of procrastination.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Delay discounting
  • impulsivity
  • procrastination
  • temporal focus
Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2005). My Instructor Made Me Do It: Task Characteristics of Procrastination. Journal of Marketing Education, 27(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0273475304273842
Bechara, A., & Van Der Linden, M. (2005). Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries. Curr Opin Neurol, 18(6), 734-739.
Besharat, M. A., Farahmand, H., & Gholamali Lavasan, M. (2018). The Mediating Role of Procrastination in the Relationship between Perfectionism Pathologies and Depression/ Anxiety Symptoms. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 14(55), 235-247. http://jip.azad.ac.ir/article_541252_001ddcfdfd01df2b3e83ed6d98a002bc.pdf
Cyders, M. A., Littlefield, A. K., Coffey, S., & Karyadi, K. A. (2014). Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale. Addict Behav, 39(9), 1372-1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.02.013
Díaz-Morales, J. F., & Ferrari, J. R. (2015). More time to procrastinators: The role of time perspective. In Time perspective theory; Review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo. (305-321). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_20
Diaz-Morales, J. F., Ferrari, J. R., & Cohen, J. R. (2008). Indecision and avoidant procrastination: the role of morningness-eveningness and time perspective in chronic delay lifestyles. J Gen Psychol, 135(3), 228-240. https://doi.org/10.3200/genp.135.3.228-240
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol, 41, 417-440. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
Ferrari, J. R., & Díaz-Morales, J. F. (2007). Procrastination: Different time orientations reflect different motives. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(3), 707-714. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.06.006
Frank, L. K. (1939). Time perspectives. Journal of Social Philosophy, 4, 293-312.
Gray, J. C., Amlung, M. T., Palmer, A. A., & MacKillop, J. (2016). Syntax for calculation of discounting indices from the monetary choice questionnaire and probability discounting questionnaire. J Exp Anal Behav, 106(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.221
Gustavson, D. E., Miyake, A., Hewitt, J. K., & Friedman, N. P. (2014). Genetic relations among procrastination, impulsivity, and goal-management ability: implications for the evolutionary origin of procrastination. Psychol Sci, 25(6), 1178-1188. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0956797614526260
Jebraeili, H., Feleghari, M., & Seydi, T. (In press). Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of Persian Version of Delay discounting Scale. Advances in Cognitive Sciences.
Jebraeili, H., Moradi, A. R., & Habibi, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of Persian short version of the five factor impulsive behavior scale. J Research & Health, 9(6), 516-524. https://doi.org/10.32598/jrh.9.6.516
Kaplan, B. A., Amlung, M., Reed, D. D., Jarmolowicz, D. P., McKerchar, T. L., & Lemley, S. M. (2016). Automating Scoring of Delay Discounting for the 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaires [journal article]. The Behavior Analyst, 39(2), 293-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0070-9
Kirby, K. N. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychon Bull Rev, 16(3), 457-462. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.16.3.457
Kirby, K. N., & Finch, J. C. (2010). The hierarchical structure of self-reported impulsivity. Pers Individ Dif, 48(6), 704-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.019
Kirby, K. N., & Marakovic, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychon Bull Rev, 3(1), 100-104. https://doi.org/ 10.3758/bf03210748
Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. J Exp Psychol Gen, 128(1), 78-87.
Klingsieck, K. B. (2013). Procrastination: When good things don’t come to those who wait. European Psychologist, 18(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000138
Lewin, K. (1943). Defining the 'field at a given time.'. Psychol Rev, 50(3), 292-310. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062738
Liu, P., & Feng, T. (2017). The overlapping brain region accounting for the relationship between procrastination and impulsivity: A voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroscience, 360, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.042
Madden, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (2010). Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting. American Psychological Association. https://books.google.com/books? id=_A9sPgAACAAJ
McKay, M. T., Percy, A., Goudie, A. J., Sumnall, H. R., & Cole, J. C. (2012). The Temporal Focus Scale: factor structure and association with alcohol use in a sample of Northern Irish school children. J Adolesc, 35(5), 1361-1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence. 2012.05.006
Rebetez, M. M. L., Rochat, L., Barsics, C., & Van der Linden, M. (2018). Procrastination as a Self-Regulation Failure: The Role of Impulsivity and Intrusive Thoughts. Psychol Rep, 121(1), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117720695
Rebetez, M. M. L., Rochat, L., Gay, P., & Van der Linden, M. (2014). Validation of a French version of the Pure Procrastination Scale (PPS). Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55(6), 1442-1447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.04.024
Rozental, A., Forsell, E., Svensson, A., Forsstrom, D., Andersson, G., & Carlbring, P. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the pure procrastination scale, the irrational procrastination scale, and the susceptibility to temptation scale in a clinical population. BMC Psychol, 2(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-014-0054-z
Shipp, A. J., & Aeon, B. (2019). Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present, and future. Curr Opin Psychol, 26, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.04.005
Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.001
Sirois, F. M. (2014). Out of Sight, Out of Time? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Procrastination and Time Perspective. European Journal of Personality, 28(5), 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1947
Stead, R., Shanahan, M. J., & Neufeld, R. W. J. (2010). “I’ll go to therapy, eventually”: Procrastination, stress and mental health. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(3), 175-180. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.028
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull, 133(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
Steel, P. (2010). Arousal, avoidant and decisional procrastinators: Do they exist? Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 926-934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org /10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.025
Steel, P., & Ferrari, J. (2013). Sex, Education and Procrastination: An Epidemiological Study of Procrastinators' Characteristics from a Global Sample. European Journal of Personality, 27(1), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1851
Steel, P., & Klingsieck, K. B. (2016). Academic Procrastination: Psychological Antecedents Revisited. Australian Psychologist, 51(1), 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12173
Steel, P., & König, C. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. The Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 889-913. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159257
van Eerde, W. (2003). A meta-analytically derived nomological network of procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(6), 1401-1418. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00358-6
Watson, D. C. (2001). Procrastination and the five-factor model: a facet level analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1), 149-158. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00019-2
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669-689. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00) 00064-7
Wu, H., Gui, D., Lin, W., Gu, R., Zhu, X., & Liu, X. (2016). The procrastinators want it now: Behavioral and event-related potential evidence of the procrastination of intertemporal choices. Brain Cogn, 1
J., & Dragan, W. L. (2018). Roles of Impulsivity, Motivation, and Emotion Regulation in Procrastination - Path Analysis and Comparison Between Students and Non-students. Front Psychol, 9, 891. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00891
Zabelina, E., Chestyunina, Y., Trushina, I., & Vedeneyeva, E. (2018). Time Perspective as a Predictor of Procrastination. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 238, 87-93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.03.011
Zhang, S., Liu, P., & Feng, T. (2019). To do it now or later: The cognitive mechanisms and neural substrates underlying procrastination. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci, e1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1492
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Pers Soc Psychol, 77(6), 1271-1288. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271