نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز

2 کارشناس ارشد روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز

3 دانشجوی کارشناسی روان‌شناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز

4 دانشجوی دکتری علوم اعصاب‌شناختی دانشگاه تبریز

5 استاد گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه تبریز

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارزیابی روابط ساختاری سیستم‌های مغزی- رفتاری و دشواری در تنظیم هیجان با نشانه‌های اختلال اضطراب فراگیر است. برای انتخاب نمونه، 240نفر (120 نفر پسر و 120 نفر دختر) از دانشجویان دانشگاه تبریز به روش نمونه‌گیری چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شده و به این پرسشنامه‌ها پاسخ دادند: مقیاس سیستم‌های بازداری/ فعال‌سازی رفتاری کارور و وایت، مقیاس دشواری در تنظیم هیجان (DERS) و نسخه چهارم پرسشنامه اختلال اضطراب فراگیر
((GAD-Q-ΙV برای تحلیل داده‌ها از روش تحلیل عاملی تأییدی و روش مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری استفاده شد. ارزیابی مدل ساختاری با استفاده از شاخص‌های مجذور کای، نسبت مجذور کای به درجه آزادی، ریشه میانگین مربعات خطای برآورد، ریشه میانگین مربعات باقیمانده استاندارد شده، شاخص نیکویی برازش، شاخص برازش مقایسه‌ای، شاخص برازش هنجار شده، شاخص برازندگی فزآینده و شاخص توکر- لوئیس نشان داد که سیستم‌های مغزی- رفتاری و دشواری در تنظیم هیجان روابط معنی‌داری با نشانه‌های اختلال اضطراب فراگیر دارد و مدل فرضی از برازندگی مناسبی برخوردار است. با تکیه بر این یافته‌ها می‌توان دریافت، دشواری در تنظیم هیجان می‌تواند نقش واسطه‌ای قابل توجهی بین سیستم‌های مغزی رفتاری و اختلال اضطراب فراگیر ایفا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Structural Relations of Brain-Behavioral Systems and Emotion Regulation Difficulties with Generalized Anxiety Disorder Symptoms

نویسندگان [English]

  • H. Karsazi 1
  • H. Fardayenisofla 2
  • M. Jafarpourrezai 3
  • N. Mashinchiabasi 4
  • T. Hasheminosratabad 5

چکیده [English]

The present study aims to evaluate the Structural relations of brain-behavioral systems and Emotion regulation difficulties with Generalized Anxiety Disorder symptoms. For sample selection, 240 students (120 male and 120 female) in Tabriz University were selected through multistage sampling and answered the following questionnaires: Carver and White's Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Scale, the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV. For data analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis and the Structural Equation Modeling technique was used. The structural model with evaluated using the chi-square test, the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, the Standard Root Mean Square Residual, the Goodness of Fit Index, the comparative fit index, the Normed fit index, the Incremental Fit Index and the Tucker-Lewis index demonstrated that brain-behavioral systems and Emotion regulation difficulties have a significant relationship with generalized anxiety disorder and that the hypothetical structure has a suitable fitness. Relying on these findings, it can be concluded that Emotion regulation difficulties can significantly mediate between brain-behavioral systems and generalized anxiety disorder.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Generalized Anxiety/ Emotion Regulation Difficulties / Brain-Behavioral Systems/ Structural equation modeling
فارسی
عبدی، رضا؛ بخشی‌پور، عباس؛ محمود علیلو، مجید؛ فرنام، علیرضا (1392). ارزیابی کارایی درمان فرا تشخیصی یکپارچه در کاهش شدت نشانه‌های زنان مبتلا به اختلال اضطراب فراگیر. مجله تحقیقات علوم رفتاری، دوره 11، شماره 5. صص 251-245.
عزیزی، علیرضا؛ میرزایی، آزاده؛ شمس، جمال (1389). بررسی رابطه تحمل آشفتگی و تنظیم هیجانی با میزان وابستگی دانشجویان به سیگار. حکیم، دوره 13، شماره 1، صص18-11.
محمدی، نوراله (1387). ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس‌های سیستم بازداری و فعال‌سازی رفتار در دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز. دانشور رفتار، سال پانزدهم، سال 15، شماره 28، 68-61.
 
لاتین
Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: a Meta analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 217–237.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: Author.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Market Research, 25 (May), 186–192.
Barlow DH. (2002). Anxiety and its disorders: the nature and treatment of anxiety and panic. 2nd Ed. New York: Guilford Press.
Bentler, P. (1998). Kurtosis, residuals, fit indices. Message posted to SEMNET discussion list. (1998, March 10). Available from http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9803&L=semnet & T=0&O =D&P=20612.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L., & Vandereycken, W. (2009). Gray’s
reinforcement sensitivity theory as a framework for research on personality psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 421–430.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K. A., Long, J. S. (Eds.). Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 136–162.
Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL. 1th Ed .Springer –Verlag, New York Inc.
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: the BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333
Chou, C. P., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. California, Sage.
Claes, L., Vertommen, S., Smits, D., & Bijttebier, P. (2009). Emotional reactivity and self-regulation in relation to personality disorders.  Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 948–953.
Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332.
Corr, P. J., & McNaughton, N., (2008). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp.155–187.
Davidson, R. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307–330.
Depue, R. A., & Iacono, W. G. (1989). Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 457–492.
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L., (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54.
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety (2nd Ed). New York: Oxford University Press.
Henriques, J. B., & Davidson, R. J. (2000). Decreased responsiveness to reward in depression. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 711–724.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55.
Hundt, N. E., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T., & Nelson-Gray, R. O. (2008). High BAS, but not low BIS, predicts externalizing symptoms in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 565–575.
Hundt, N. E., Nelson-Gray, R. O., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). The interaction of reinforcement sensitivity and life events in the prediction of an hedonic depression and mixed anxiety – depression symptoms. Personality and  Individual Differences, 43, 1001–1012.
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., Jin, R., & Walters, E. E. (2005). Life time prevalence and age – of – onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the national co morbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychology, 62, 593–602.
Kimbrel, N. A. (2008). A model of the development and maintenance of generalized social phobia. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 592–612.
Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3nd Ed. New York: Guilford.
Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2005). Preliminary evidence for an emotion dysregulation model of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Research and Therapy, 43, 1281–1310.
Newman, M. G., Zuellig, A. R., Kachin, K. E., Constantino, M. J., Przeworski, A., Erickson, T., et al. (2002). Preliminary reliability and validity of the GAD-Q-IV: a revised self-report diagnostic measure of generalized anxiety disorder. Behavior Research Therapy, 33 (2), 215-33.
Pickett, S. M., Bardeen, J. R., & Orcutt, H. K. (2011). Experiential avoidance as a moderator of the relationship between behavioral inhibition system sensitivity and post traumatic stress symptoms. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 1038–1045.
Pickett, S. M., Lodis, C. S., Parkhill, M. R., & Orcutt, H. K. (2012). Personality and experiential avoidance: a model of anxiety sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 246–250.
Pickett, S. M., Markarian, S. A., Deveson, D. F., & Kanona B. B.
(2013). A model of BIS/BAS sensitivity, emotion regulation  difficulties, and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in relation to sleep quality. Psychiatry Research, 210, 281–286.
Poythress, N. G., Skeem, J. L., Weir, J., Lilienfeld, S. C., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., & Kennealy, P. J. (2008). Psychometric properties of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales in a large sample of offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 732–737.
Randles, D., Flett, G. L., Nash, K. A., McGregor, I. D., & Hewitt, P. L. (2010). Dimensions of perfectionism, behavioral inhibition, and rumination. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 83–87.
Raykov. T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling, 2th Ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scheres, A., & Sanfey, A. G. (2006). Individual differences in decision making: drive and reward responsiveness affect strategic bargaining in economic games. Behavioral and Brain Function, 2, 35.
Steiger, J. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality Individual Differences; 42 (5), 893-898.
Suveg, C., Sood, E., Comer, J. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2008). Changes in emotion regulation following cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxious youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 390–401.
Tabachnik, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. 5th Ed. New York: Allen and Bacon.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 320–333.
Tull, M. T., Gratz, K. L., Latzman, R. D., Kimbrel, N. A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2010). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and emotion regulation difficulties: a multimodal investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 989–994.
Turk, C. L., Heimberg, R. G., Luterek, J. A., Mennin, D. S., & Fresco, D. M. (2005). Delineating emotion regulation deficits in generalized anxiety disorder: a comparison with social anxiety disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 89–106.
Weston, R., & Gore, P.A. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Counseling Psychology, 34 (5), 719-751.