نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیأت علمی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه الزهرا (س) تهران
2 عضو هیأت علمی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر به منظور بررسی علل از هم پاشیدگی خانواده‌ها در دوران قبل از ازدواج، عوامل آشناییهای قبلی و تطابق ویژگیهای فردی، خانوادگی، اجتماعی، فرهنگی و شخصیتی زوجین انجام شد. هدف از انجام آن برداشتن گامی مؤثر در جهت پیشگیری از تلاشی خانواده‌ها از طریق شناخت عوامل فوق بود. تا جوانان بتوانند به وسیله پرسشنامه‌های تهیه و ارائه شده، قبل از ازدواج شناخت بیشتری نسبت به خصوصیات یکدیگر پیدا کنند و از زندگی پایدار و موفقی برخوردار گردند. تحقیق در دو مرحله مطالعه مقدماتی با نمونه‌ای به حجم 40 نفر و مرحله اصلی با نمونه‌ای به حجم 200 نفر انجام شد. نمونه اخیر شامل 50 خانواده ناموفق (100 زن و شوهر) و 50 خانواده موفق (100 زن و شوهر) می‌شد که به طور تصادفی انتخاب گردیدند. خانواده‌های ناموفق به کمک دادگاههای خانواده و به عنوان گروه آزمایشی و خانواده‌های موفق به طور موازی با گروه اول و به عنوان گروه گواه برگزیده شدند. ابزار سنجش شامل آزمون خلقی گلیفورد- زیمرمن و پرسشنامه جامع فردی اجتماعی بود: اهم نتایج به شرح زیر است: 1. کمی سن جوانان به هنگام ازدواج، فقر اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی، کم بودن سواد، پایین بودن سطح شغلی، دخالت بی مورد اطرافیان، پدیده طلاق والدین زوجهای ناموفق، وابستگی مالی زوجین به والدین همه از عوامل تهدید کننده زندگی مشترک زوجین جوان بودند. 2. عدم همسویی زوجین در جهات مختلف موجب اختلاف زناشویی بین زوجین می‌شود. 3. تشابه نظرات زوجین به عنوان عامل تداوم بخش زندگی مشترک شناخته شد. 4. وجود بیماریهای جسمی، روانی و اختلافات رفتاری اعلام نشده از سوی همسران و خانواده‌های آنها عامل سستی روابط بین زوجین تلقی شد. 5. حصول شناخت از خصوصیات یکدیگر قبل از ازدواج به عنوان عامل تداوم بخش زندگی شناخته شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identification of the Causes of Family Disintegration due to the Premarital Psycho-social Charateristics of Men and Women
نویسندگان [English]
- S. Banijamli 1
- G. Nafisi 2
- S. Yazdi 1
1 Member of the Faculty of Al-Zahra University, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Psychology, Tehran, Iran
2 Member of the faculty of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
چکیده [English]
The present research was performed to probe into the disintegration of families due to the prenuptial period characteristics, courting and the compatibility of the spouses’ personal, family, social, cultural and personality characteristics. The research is taking a step toward preventing the disintegration of families via recognizing the above-mentioned factors so that by means of questionnaires the youth could get better acquainted with one another’s characteristics in order to enjoy a steady and prosperous life later. The research was conducted in two stages with a sample of 40 subjects at the introductory and a sample of 200 subjects at the main stage. The recent sample comprised of 50 unsuccessful families (50 couples) and 50 successful families (50 couples) chosen randomly. Aided by family courtrooms, unsuccessful families were selected as the experimental group, and parallel to it, successful families as the control group. Assessment tools were adopted from the Guilford- Zimmerman Temperament Survey as well as the Comprehensive Individual- Social Questionnaires. The major results are as follows: 1) Marrying at a young age, economic, social and cultural poverty, little schooling, having inferior jobs, others’ unjustified interferences, divorce of unsuccessful parents and the economic dependence of the couples on parents have all been factors threatening the young couples’ married life, 2) Lack of similar attitudes and opinions between the spouses brought up differences, 3) Similiarity of attitudes and opinions was recognized as the factor perpetuating married life, 4) Physical, mental and conduct disorders not revealed by the spouses or their families to in weak relations, and 5) Courting and getting to know each other’s characteristics before marriage was considered as the factor perpetuating married life.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- marriage
- family
- divorce
- marital adjustment
- premarital characteristics
Bencosin, Margaret Hales (1997). Families Education and Social Differences, selection and editorial matter, The open university.
Bouchard, Genevieve, Lussier-Yuan, Sabourm- stephane (1999). Personality and marital adjustment: utility of the five factor model at personality, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 3.
Carison Jon, sperrylen, Judith A.Lewis (1997). Family therapy by books/ cole publishing company.
Chronc-Pavel, Plhakova- A (2000). Differences in marital satisfaction of men and women. Ceska- a -Sbvenska- Psychiatrie, 96-1.
Davidson Bernand, Balswick Jack, Halverson charles (1983). Affective self disclosure and marital adjustment, a test of equity theory, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 1 Feb.
Deker, Leonand R, (1978). A Comparison of husband- wife perceptions of feminism as related to marital adjustment, Midwest Sociological Society (MSS), united state.
Eileen kennedy- Moore- Jeannec. Watson (1999). Expressing Emotion (myths, realies, and therapeutic, strategies), The Guilford press.
Escalera- Izquierdo- Maria- Esebastian- Herranz- J. (2000). A Comparative analysis between employed and house wife women, Clinicany- Solud.
Gasta car!, steer Robert A, Kotzker Eileen, & Schut, Jacob. (1978).
Relationship between similiarity of Needs and Marital Adjustment in
Dyadic and Monodic Heroin Addicted couples, International Journal of
Faimly Counseling, 6, 1, Spring.
Gerler, ER. (1993). Parents families and the school, Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 27,4.
Gill- Debra- 5, christensen- Andrew, Fincham-Frank- D. (1999). Predicting mairtal. Satisfaction from Behavior, Personal Relationahips, 6, 3, sep.
Gove waiter R. Peterson Elaire. (1980). An update of the literature on personal and Marital Adjustment, The effect of children and the employment of wives, Journal of Marriage and Family Review, 3, 34 Fallwi ter.
Graham- Carolyn- W, Fischer- Juolith, Fitzpatrick- Jacki, Bina- Kristan (2000). Parental status, social suppot, and marital adjustment. Journal- of
-family- Issues, 21, 7.
Gritz Ellen R, wellisch Dawid k., Siau Jessie, Wang- He Jing (1990). Longterm effects of testicular cancer on Marital Relationships, Psychosomatic, sum.
31, 3.
Guilford J, P., Zimmerman waynes, (1949). Manual of Instructions and Interpretations, Sheridam Supply Company.
Harper James M., Elliott Michael L., (1988). The relationship between Desired level of intimacy and marital adjustment, American Journal of Family Therapy, 10, 4, winter.
1-lause knecht shar onk, Macice Annes, (1981). Combining Marriage and career, The marital adjustment. professional women, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 3 Aug.
Lamke, Leannek- (1989). Marital Adjustment among rural couples, The role of expressiveness, sexole 21, 9-10 Nov.
Leslie, Leigh, A.Anderson, Elaine A. (1988). Men’s and women’s participation in domestic roles. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, Dec.
McCarrey, Medling, James M. Michael (1981). Marital adjustiment over segments of the family life cycle, The issues of spouses, value, similarity Journal of Marriage and the Family, 13, 1, Feb.
Nichols, Virginia Quinn (1985). Applying psychology, McGraw Hill Book Co.
Peterson, Yen (1979). The Impact of physical Disability on marital adjustment, Journel of Family Coordinator, 28, 1, Jan.
Pick- deweiss, Susan Andrade, & Palos, & Patricia (1988). Socio demographic difference in marital satisfaction, Revi.sta- de- Psychologia- Social, 3, 1.
Ronald, B. Adler, Nell owne (1990). Looking out, looking in. sixth edition, Holt, Rinehart and winston inc.
Senchak, Marilyn, Leonard, Kenneth E. (1992). Attachment styles and marital adjustment among newlywed- Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 1, Feb.
)