نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناس ارشد علوم شناختی، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

3 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران.

چکیده

هدف از این مطالعه، بررسی اثربخشی تحریک الکتریکی فراجمجمه‌ای مغز بر توجه و الگوی الکتروانسفالوگرافی کودکان دارای اختلال نقص توجه بود. جامعه آماری در این مطالعه، کل کودکان دارای اختلال نقص توجه در شهر شیراز بود. نمونه آماری شامل 24 کودک در محدوده سنی 8 تا 11 سال بود که با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از مراکز مشاوره شهر شیراز انتخاب شدند. سپس در دو گروه 12 نفری گواه و 12 نفری آزمایشی به‌صورت تصادفی قرار گرفتند. در گروه آزمایشی، الکترود آند روی ناحیه FP1 و الکترود کاتد روی کتف دست راست قرار گرفت و به وسیلة کش بر روی سر محکم شد. در هر جلسه، جریان الکتریکی به‌طور مستقیم، با شدت 1 میلی‌آمپر به مدت 30 دقیقه برای هر آزمودنی انجام گرفت. ابزار تحقیق شامل پرسشنامه ویژگی‌های جمعیت شناختی، آزمون اثر استروپ و دستگاه ثبت الکتروانسفالوگرافی بود. تعداد جلسات تحریک الکتریکی فراجمجمه‌ای مغز در گروه آزمایشی، 10 جلسه در طول سه هفته بود. پس از اتمام جلسات مداخله، به منظور اجرای پس‌آزمون، مجدداً ثبت EEG و آزمون استروپ برای هر دو گروه گواه و آزمایشی اجرا شد. سپس هر دو گروه از نظر میزان توجه انتخابی و الگوی الکتروانسفالوگرافی، با یکدیگر مقایسه شدند. داده‌های آماری از طریق تحلیل کوورایانس در سطح 01/0p< مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. برای تحلیل داده‌ها از نرم‌افزار SPSS استفاده شد. نتیجة مقایسه پیش‌آزمون و پس‌آزمون نشان داد که اثر تحریک الکتریکی فراجمجمه‌ای مغز (tDCS) در گروه آزمایشی معنی‌دار است. لذا به نظر می‌رسد که تحریک الکتریکی فراجمجمه‌ای مغز بر بهبود توجه انتخابی و کاهش نسبت تتا/ بتا در ناحیه CZ کودکان دارای اختلال نقص توجه تأثیرگذار است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Attention and Electroencephalographic Pattern in Children with Attention Deficit Disorder

نویسندگان [English]

  • Naeemeh Sayafan 1
  • Alireza Hajiyakhchali 2
  • Manijeh Shehniyailagh 3

1 MA of Cognitive Sciences, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Associate professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

3 professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Attention can be described as the choice of a thing or thought from several thoughts or several things by the mind so clearly that it seems to have happened at the same time. The ability to pay attention allows a person to control the entry of different stimuli into the consciousness stage of the mind and choose only a limited number of them from different stimuli. Research shows that attention deficit disorder is one of the main educational problems.
 
Method
The statistical population was all the children with attention deficit disorder who were referred to a counseling center, in Shiraz in 2019. The statistical sample consisted of 36 children between 8 to 11 years old, who were selected from the counseling center using a targeted sampling method. Then they were assigned into three groups of control (12 persons) and an experimental group (12 samples). In the experimental group, the anode electrode was placed on the FP1 region, and the cathode electrode was placed on the right shoulder blade and fastened to the head with a clamp. In each session, transcranial direct current stimulation was applied at an intensity of 1 mA for 30 minutes for each subject. Research tools were the Demographic Characteristics Questionnaire, Stroop Effect Test, and Electroencephalograph recorder. 10 transcranial Direct Current Stimulation sessions for each subject in the experimental group were done over three weeks. During the interventions, the control group was under the passage of time. In the post-test, both groups were compared in terms of attention and Electroencephalographic patterns. The statistical data analysis was performed using the analysis of covariance at p < 0.05. SPSS software was used for data analysis. 
 
Results
The results of the pre-test and post-test comparison showed that the effect of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) was significant in the experimental group. Therefore, it seems that transcranial Direct Current Stimulation affects the attention and electroencephalographic pattern of children with attention deficit disorder. As a result, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation can be used to treat children with attention deficit disorder. Since the level of students' attention to the subject of the lesson is one of the main factors of education and learning, therefore, according to the results of the mentioned studies and the present research, it can be concluded that Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation increases the excitability of the children's brain.
 
Conclusion
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation is effective in improving selective attention and reducing the theta/beta ratio in the CZ region of children with attention deficit disorder. Therefore, it is suggested that extracranial Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the fp1 region be used as an adjunct to accelerate the treatment of children with ADD

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Attention Deficit Disorder
  • Electroencephalography
  • Stroop Effect
  • tDCS
Abdollahi, M. (2015). The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tdcs) on working memory in healthy individuals (Master Thesis). Kharzami University. [Persian]
Akbari, F., Talebi, M., & FathiAshtiani, A. (2017). The effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs) in reducing depressive symptoms in people with depressive disorder. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 95-101. [Persian]
Alboghebish, S., Shetab Boushehri, N., Danshfar, A., & Abedanzadeh, R. (2017). Assiament facilitate and significant interference of stroop effect on psychological refractory period. Neuropsychology, 2(7), 93-106. [Persian]
Baddeley, A. D. (2000). Working memory: Theory and practice. London, U.K: Oxford University press.
Bakhshayesh, A. R., Schneider, A., Wyschkon, A., Esser, G., & Ihle, W. (2007). Effectiveness of neurofeedback therapy in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). World Congress of Behavioural & Cognitive Therapies, Abstract Band and Barcelona, Spain. 33.
Chronis, A. M., Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, E. M., Roberts, J. E., & Aronoff, H. R. (2003). The impact of late-afternoon stimulant dosing for children with ADHD on parent and parent-child domains. Clinical Child Adolescent Psychology, 32(1), 118-126.
Dasilva, A. F., Volz, M. S., Bikson, M., & Fregni, F. (2013) Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. RACGP Online. Available at: http://www.jove.com/pdf/2744/jove-protocol-2744-electrode-positioning-montage-transcranial-direct-current. Accessed March 15.
Dedoncher, J., Brunoni, A R., Baeken, Ch., Vanderhasselt, M-A. (2016). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in healthy and neuropsychoatric samples: Influence of stimulation parameters. Brain Stimulation, 9(4), 501-517.
Ebadi, M., Hosseini, F., Pahlevan, F., Esmaeeilzadeh Akhoundi, M., Farhadi, V., & Asqari, R. (2017). The effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs) on working memory in patients with major depression. Arak Medical University Journal, 20(5), 38-47. [Persian]
Egner, T., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2004). EEG biofeedback of low beta band components: frequency-specific effects on variables of attention and event-related brain potentials. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 115(1), 131-139.
Galán, F. C., & Beal, C. R. (2012). EEG estimates of engagement and cognitive workload predict math problem solving outcomes. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7379. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Gladwin, T. E., den Uyl, T. E., & Wiers, R. W. (2012). Anodal tDCS of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during an implicit association test. Neuroscience Letter, 517(2), 82-86.
Ghadiri, F., Jazayeri, A., Ashayeri, H., & Ghazi Tabatabaei, M. (2007). The role of cognitive rehabilitation in reduction of executive function deficits and obsessive– compulsive symptoms in schizo– obsessive patients. Archives of Rehabilitation (Journal of Rehabilitation), 7(4), 15-24. [Persian]
Halperin, J. M., & Healey D. M. (2011). The influences of environmental enrichment, cognitive enhancement, and physical exercise on brain development: Can we alter the developmental trajectory of ADHD. Neuroscience and Behavioral Reviews, 35(3), 621-634.
James, W. (1901). The principles of psychology. Londen: Macmillan.
Jeon, S. Y., & Han, S. J. (2012). Improvement of the working memory and naming by transcranial direct current stimulation. Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 36(5), 585-595.
Kaplan, H., & Sadock, V. A. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock's synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry (11th Ed.). Philadelphia, PA, US: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publishers.
Lefaucheur, J. P., Antal, A., Ayache, S. S., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Cogiamanian, F., … & Paulus, W. (2017). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (Tdcs). Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(1), 56-92.
Moliadze, V., Schmanke, T., Andreas, S., Lyzhko, E., Freitag, C. M., & Siniatchkin, M. (2014). Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126(7), 1392-1399.
Moriyama, T., Polanczyk, G., & Rohde, L. (2012). Neurotherapeutics. National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry for Children and Adolescents, 12-19.
Nejati, V., Salehinejad, M. A., Nitsche, M. A., Najian, A., & Javadi, A.-H. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves executive dysfunctions in ADHD: Implications for inhibitory control, interference control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1087054717730611. [Persian]
Rostami, R., Besharat, M., Karimi, M., & Farahani, H. (2016). The effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation on the brain function of obese individuals. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly, 7(3), 127-145. 
Sharifi, S. (2013). Comparison of the effectiveness of different neurofeedback protocols in reducing the symptoms of two different types of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Master Thesis). Allameh Tabatabayi University. [Persian]
Soltaninejad, Z., Nejati, V., & Ekhtiari, H. (2015). Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on remediation of inhibitory control on right inferio frontal gyrus in attention deficit and hyperactivity symptoms. Scientific Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 3(4), 1-9. [Persian]
Swingle, P. (2015). Adding neurotherapy to your practice (1st ed.). New York: Springer.
Swanson, J. M., McBurnett, K., Christian, D. L., & Wigal, T. (1995). Stimulant medications and the treatment of children with ADHD. Advances in Clinical Child Psychology, 17, 265-322.
Swanson, L. H., & Jerman, O. (2007). The influence of working memory on reading growth in subgroups of children with reading disabilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 249-283.
Teplan, M. (2002). Fundamentals of EEG measurement. Measurement Science Review, 2(2), 1-11.
Vaqef, L., & Zahedi, M. (2019). The effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) on alpha wave absolute power of the frontal region in methamphetamine users. Journal of Neuropsychology, 5(17), 43-58. [Persian]
Wegner, L., Flisher, A. J., Chikobvu, P., Lombard, C., & King, G. (2008). Leisure boredom and high school dropout in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Adolescents, 31(3), 421-431.
Wilson, V., Thompson, M., Thompson, J., & Peper, E. (2011). Using EEG for enhancing performance: Arousal, attention, self-talk, and imagery, in biofeedback and neurofeedback applications in sport psychology. Wheat Ridge, 196-232.